Guidelines for Authors


  1. Journal Scope
  2. Authorship
  3. Conflicts of Interest        
  4. Duplicate Submission   
  5. Ethics
  6. Manuscript Types
  7. Manuscript Preparation and Submission
  8. Reviewers       
  9. Plagiarism          
  10. Language           
  11. Referencing Styles           
  12. Tables and Figures
  13. Abbreviations    
  14. Very Long Articles             
  15. Questionnaires and Data Sets      
  16. Themed Articles 
  17. Pre-prints       
  18. Fees and Fee structures
  19. Publication, Reviewing and Responding to Reviews          
  20. Submitting a Revised Version of your article          
  21. Advertising the article   
  22. Retraction of articles by MedEdPublish      
  23. Articles not receiving peer-reviews         
  24. Retention of all original submissions     
  25. Copyright         
  26. Depositing of final articles in other repositories    
  27. Open Access
MedEdPublish – Guidelines for Authors
Version 01: July 2018

Last update: August 2021 - The new MedEdPublish Platform is now open for submissions, guidelines for new submissions can be found here.
Previous update: June 2019 - additional guidance for authors of very long manuscripts added; guidelines for revised versions updated; acceptance of themed articles updated.
Please note that the Author Guidelines of MedEdPublish are designed to conform to the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, Updated December 2017, available at:

1. Journal Scope

MedEdPublish invites the submission of articles addressing any theme of relevance to healthcare professionals’ education. 
Please see the journal home page and/or submissions page for up-to-date information about any content and article types the journal is not currently accepting.

2. Authorship

In order to qualify as an author of a MedEdPublish article, the person should have made a substantial contribution to the article.
Citing from the ICJME Recommendations, each author needs to have made:
  • “Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
  • Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND
  • Final approval of the version to be published; AND
  • Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.”
NOTE: simply being a Head of Department, Head of Laboratory or other position does NOT automatically qualify one as an author.  The submitting author will be required to complete a brief description of the work performed by each author.
MedEdPublish reserves the right to contact any person listed as an author to confirm that they are an author of the article.
All authors are responsible for the content of an article, so all authors need to:
  • have independent access to all raw data, and
  • inspect drafts of the manuscript before it is submitted.
If a person has made some contribution, but not enough to be considered an author, then that person should be listed in the article’s Acknowledgements, with a brief description of their contribution.  These might include proofing, searching for references, technical editing and administrative assistance.  Articles dealing with surveys may also acknowledge the contribution of survey participants. For further details of authors’ contributions, please see ICMJE Recommendations at:

Authors’ roles, functions and requirements should be clearly stated, preferably before the research begins, so that all contributors are aware of their duties.  Any persons co-opted (including proof-readers, and internal reviewers, beta-testers, etc.) should be aware of their duties, and their designate acknowledgment (as author or listed in the Acknowledgment section of the article). The order of the authors must be determined by the authors beforehand. MedEdPublish will not advise on this decision.
Role of the corresponding author

The submitter of the manuscript MUST be the corresponding author, and all communication with MedEdPublish should be through this person. The corresponding author does not have to be the first author of the article, but must be prepared to deal with all queries pre- and post-publication, including requests made by the editorial team to alter and resubmit an article if necessary. Any queries relating to the status of a submitted manuscript should come from the corresponding author in the first instance. We will not discuss details regarding the status of a manuscript pre-publication or any details relating to the payment of fees with anyone other than the corresponding author. If you are the corresponding author on a manuscript, it is your responsibility to check regularly for email updates on the status of your manuscript. You may also need to check your spam or junk folders as many of our emails are system generated. The majority of manuscripts submitted to MedEdPublish are reopened to authors at least once for minor alterations, and reopened manuscripts are automatically rejected after the deadline stated in the change request if the authors do not take action.

Please note that the journal is migrating to a new platform in autumn 2021. If your manuscript is in processing, it is imperative that you resubmit your manuscript with any changes by the date specified by our admin team. If there is likely to be a delay for any reason, please get in touch with us as soon as possible to discuss options. Any queries should be directed to [email protected].

3. Conflicts of Interest

Possible conflicts of interest (whether financial, non-financial affiliation, rivalry, intellectual or other beliefs) must be declared for all authors at the time of submission.
In addition, if any authors have been denied access to raw data (e.g. through legal agreements with study sponsors), this needs to be stated clearly in the conflicts of interests, and reasons must be given.

4. Duplicate Submission

All articles submitted to MedEdPublish must be original work. Authors should not submit the same manuscript, in the same or different languages, simultaneously to another journal.

Articles submitted to pre-print servers such as ArXiv or lodged in institutional repositories may be submitted to MedEdPublish.  Authors must add a statement to the Acknowledgements section of the manuscript indicating which pre-print server / repository the manuscript was submitted to, the date of the submission and a hyperlink to any associated DOI.  Additionally, if there was any commentary on the manuscript, and any of these comments were used to make a revision of the manuscript prior to submission to MedEdPublish, we recommend that this is also indicated.  It is not necessary to mention the name of each commenter, but it is important to indicate what has been changed and why.  If appropriate the authors may acknowledge those who offered feedback in a general statement.
If the articles submitted are based on unpublished reports, conference abstracts and posters, this should be stated clearly in the text. If the submitted work is based on an examined report, for example, a thesis or dissertation, it must be re-written in the style of a journal article to be considered for publication. The original work must be acknowledged in the Acknowledgements section including a link to any organisational repository where the work is stored. We will not publish full theses or dissertations (see also our guidance on very long articles).
Authors may submit multiple articles based on upon the same dataset, although they should guard against writing multiple articles that overlap substantially in terms of precise data used, their analysis and interpretation, or conclusions drawn, whether submitted to the same or different journals. This practice is known as “salami slicing” and is regarded as a form of academic misconduct. All submitted manuscripts will be checked using a similarity checker

5. Ethics

All articles involving research subjects (e.g. patients, learners, junior members of faculty – anywhere where there is a power-differential) must have been conducted within the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (  When the manuscript is submitted, the corresponding author is required to complete an ethics statement that should contain details of ethics approval or the reason approval was not sought.  
Where ethical approval was applied for, authors should provide:
  • Name of Institutional or Independent Ethics Committee / IRB
  • Ethics Approval Reference Number, OR
  • Statement from the Committee explaining why ethics approval is not required.
If approval was not sought, please read our policy on protection of research participants carefully as it outlines the circumstances under which we may publish research that has not been considered by an ethics committee.

Human-related data should be securely protected, and the article should contain details of the data protection performed.  Special care should be taken with photographs (including radiological images), videos, audio files, screen-shots and other electronic data to ensure that permissions have been obtained, and that all reasonable steps have been taken to remove identifying information. If subjects are identified, then the authors should state clearly that the subjects have granted permission, or should indicate why such permission is not necessary. Although media will frequently need to be edited to hide identifying information, the deceptive manipulation of media to give a false impression will not be accepted by MedEdPublish.

Further information is available in our policy statements on protection of research participants and use of images in manuscripts.

6. Manuscript Types

MedEdPublish accepts the following types of manuscript:
  • Research articles
    • New research
    • Replication of previous studies
    • Studies with negative findings
    • Pilot studies
  • Reports of meetings and workshops
  • Case studies
  • New education methods or tools
  • Practical tips and/or guidelines
  • Personal views and opinion pieces
  • Reviews of the literature
  • Commentaries (by invitation only)
  • Letters
From time to time we may issue calls for specific article types and/or stop accepting submissions in some categories. It is your responsibility to check the submissions portal before uploading a manuscript to ensure the category you are submitting in is currently being accepted.

Please note that all articles, including Personal views and opinion pieces, must have a meaningful Abstract, and be a well-structured and argued contribution, preferably substantiated by references, just as one would do for any academic article.  Personal views and opinion pieces should not be understood to mean something quickly written, or random thoughts simply placed online. That function is fulfilled by personal blogs, so authors might consider placing that material in those areas.

A letter to the editor is a brief communication that may be on any topic, with two exceptions.  Letters that comment on articles published in MedEdPublish will not be accepted.  Instead, these comments should be submitted through the review or comment function that contributes to a potentially valuable discussion thread.  Letters written in response to articles published in other journals should be submitted to those journals and will also not be accepted.

7. Manuscript Preparation and Submission

How it Works:  
To view a diagram of the MedEdPublish process from submission to final revision, click here

It is the submitter's responsibility to regularly check their email account (including their spam folder) to ensure important email communications relating to their manuscript are picked up. Prior to submitting a manuscript, please ensure that the following email addresses have been added to the 'safe senders' list in your email account in order to ensure that you receive important communications from us: [email protected] and [email protected]  These are 'no-reply' email addresses and any queries relating to manuscript submissions should be directed to [email protected]

Logging in
You should log in to the MedEdPublish website with your AMEE username and password.  If you cannot remember your AMEE credentials, please contact us at [email protected] and we will assist you.  Please do not try to create a new account on the MedEdPublish website directly as this may lead to a duplication of accounts on our system.

If you do not have an AMEE username and password, you should register on the MedEdPublish website directly to create a free account.  You should keep your username and password safe and should not disclose it to anyone else. 

Once logged in, manuscripts can be submitted by first navigating to the 'Submit an Article' menu option on the homepage and after clicking the ‘Start Process’ button the manuscript submission form will become available.

To qualify for an AMEE Individual or Student member discount, manuscripts  must be submitted by the member him/herself from his/her own account and not by any other person on the member’s behalf. The member must be the corresponding author, and the corresponding author’s registered email address will be used in all communications about the manuscript.

Constructing your manuscript
Unlike many other journals, MedEdPublish requires the manuscript to be submitted in text boxes in a particular layout format. Corresponding authors should familiarise themselves with the submission process so that it can proceed smoothly.  Detailed video documentation of the submission process can be found here:
The main difference between submitting to MedEdPublish and other journals is that you, as author, construct the layout of the article.  This allows you to have far more control over seeing exactly what the article will look like before submitting, and also reduces processing time and costs on our side, which means that your article can be published a lot quicker, keeping the charges to you to a minimum.
Although the text boxes in the submission form do allow for editing, we strongly recommend that the authors make changes in the original MS-Word document and then copy-and-paste from the MS-Word document into the text boxes. This will ensure that your original MS-Word document is identical to the information that you have submitted.
In addition to inserting their information into the text boxes, authors are required to submit the full MS-Word document of their manuscript with all their tables and figures.  This will allow staff to verify that the finished product is a suitable reproduction of the original, and will reduce delays caused by their having to contact the corresponding authors. 

Note that the preview and submit processes require the use of pop-ups, so, if you have your pop-ups disabled, then you will need to enable them for the MedEdPublish site.

Research articles must have the following structure: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion and Conclusion (Frequently known as IMRAD). For all other article types, the author may choose whichever headings they deem suitable.
The system is specifically designed to work with single-spaced text, so do not convert your manuscript to double-spacing.  Leave it in the default font, size 12, and single-spaced.

Information fields:  
We request the following information for each manuscript (obligatory information is marked with an asterisk):
  • Title of article* (Maximum 40 words).
  • Manuscript type* (e.g. Research Article, Case study, etc.)
  • Corresponding author’s details, including email address.* (Note that the corresponding author has to be the submitting author.  This author does not have to be the first author).
  • Authors’ information.* For each author: first name, last name, institution, Twitter handle (Optional), description of work performed by each author.
  • Abstract* (Maximum 300 words; not required for letters).
  • Keywords / phrases* (Maximum of 10 keywords / phrases).
  • MedEdPublish categories* – this is a general subject category for searching and for allocating reviewers; a minimum of one and a maximum of five categories must be chosen.
  • The article, divided into sections (Introduction, Methods, etc.)*
  • Take home message* (5 bullet points, maximum of 100 words).
  • Notes on contributors.*
  • Acknowledgements.
  • Bibliography / References.
  • Number of words.* While no word limits are imposed, authors are reminded that concise writing is more readable and likely to attract positive reviews. See our guidance on very long articles.
  • Appendices. These appear as text immediately below your article.
  • Supplementary files. These should be uploaded as pdf files unless you are deliberately providing editable resources. We are unable to accept video files.
  • Word Document of manuscript.* This is needed so that the administrative staff can double-check the layout of the article to ensure that it matches what you intended.
  • Reviewer Nominations. All manuscript types except letters allow authors to nominate up to four reviewers. Please note, however, that the editor makes the final decision on which reviewers are invited and is under no obligation to use any of your nominated reviewers.
  • Declarations*
    • Ethics Approval
    • Funding Details
    • Whether this is a previously rejected article
    • Whether this article is under consideration by other journals (this would usually be grounds for rejection from MedEdPublish)
    • Use Statement: regarding media that may identify third-parties
    • Third-party image permissions, if needed
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • General Terms and Conditions have been read

8. Reviewers

Authors are encouraged to nominate at least two reviewers for their manuscript. These may or may not be members of MedEdPublish Panel of Reviewers. All of our panel members should have selected categories of interest which could help guide your choice. Nominees should not be close colleagues or from the same organisational unit as the authors. Note that the editor is under no obligation to invite a nominated reviewer, and may invite reviewers outwith the Review Panel where they have relevant expertise.  

Articles with nominated reviewers are published in exactly the same way and will still be open to any person to review – the difference is that, by nominating reviewers, you increase the likelihood of receiving panel reviews. Only panel member reviews (including reviews by nominated reviewers) count towards an article's Recommended status. This is how we determine that an article has met suitable academic standards for indexing.

9. Plagiarism

The Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) is a member of Similarity Check which is a service provided by Crossref. All manuscripts submitted to MedEdPublish are automatically checked for similarity to other published works online prior to publication.  
Using the comparison tool iThenticate provided by Turnitin, it is possible to actively pursue plagiarism in scholarly publishing. The iThenticate software is designed to assist editors in ensuring that manuscripts submitted to MedEdPublish are not duplicated, in part or whole, elsewhere. iThenticate does not detect plagiarism, it detects similarity or matches; it is the responsibility of the editors to determine whether or not this similarity or matching constitutes plagiarism.
Where plagiarism is suspected, authors may request access to similarity software reports and other evidence gathered by the editorial team. 
Reports of suspected plagiarism should be sent directly to [email protected] as soon as possible.

10. Language

All articles must be submitted in English.  The authors are responsible for obtaining English language editing to ensure readability.  Please note that articles deemed to be unintelligible may be rejected during the initial checking stage before publication.
If authors use quotations from texts written in languages other than English, then the original quotation should be given, followed, in square brackets, by a reasonable English translation.  In the list of references, it is permissible to list article/book/journal titles in their original language (although it is recommended that authors also supply a reasonable translation of the title).

11. Referencing Styles

MedEdPublish uses a referencing style based on the Harvard Cite them Right 9th Edition. This is an author-date style. In the References section, the DOIs are also cited, if available. Note that the original style requires all authors to be inserted in the bibliography, but, if a reference has more than five authors, then MedEdPublish allows you to cite only the first five authors, followed by “et al.

Poorly formatted citations and references are the top reason for returning manuscripts to the authors. The most common issues are:
  • Not using single quotation marks round article titles
  • Listing all authors instead of using et al. when citing five authors or more
  • Not using the full DOI string
  • Not inserting DOIs at all
  • Using a numerical referencing style instead of an author-date style
  • Numbering references even although they are in alphabetical order
Authors are requested to read the 'referencing style guide' carefully. We strongly recommend the use of citation management software with the MedEdPublish style downloaded and installed:
  • Mendeley or Zotero: found here
  • EndNote: found here
  • Citavi: The MedEdPublish style has already been added into the Citavi software.
  • RefWorks: Unfortunately, RefWorks issues licences to institutions only, and no longer to individuals.  As we do not have an institutional licence, we cannot legally access RefWorks’ proprietary style to create a style file for RefWorks. 
If you have no reference manager, then you can use free online reference generators, such as: Citation Machine at:

If the online referencing style does not automatically insert the doi, then you will need to insert that manually.
For details of how to install the style files, or if you wish to perform all your referencing manually, then please see the 'referencing style guide', also available to download as a pdf, giving installation instructions and a few examples.

12. Tables and Figures

If your work contains tables and/or figures, please read the following section carefull as this is a very common reason for reopening manuscripts to authors and one which often takes significant time and effort to resolve. This could easily be avoided by following these directions.

Please note that in order to comply with copyright law we have introduced specific guidelines for the use of images in manuscripts which should be read before a manuscript is submitted. If your manuscript includes Figures, the source of each Figure should be stated in the Acknowledgements section of your manuscript. Please click on the following link to view our Use of images in manuscripts policy.

Tables and Figures should be inserted in the main body text and not as appendices or supplementary files. They must be numbered separately (e.g. Table 1, Table 2, Figure 1, Figure 2) and captioned with a descriptive caption above each table or figure. All tables and figures must be referred to in the text.

Tables are to be inserted directly into the text where you would like them to be. Tables must not be inserted as images, and must be created in a word processing package, then copied and pasted into the manuscript submission form. Tables pasted directly from a spreadsheet or statistical software package rarely display correctly and can cause coding errors in the manuscript submission form. Each section of your table should have a full border around it. If you have very complex tables, or if they have to be landscape-oriented, they might not format correctly, but because you will also be uploading your complete Word document, our staff will be able to make appropriate changes to the final document so that it correctly resembles your manuscript. 

Figures (Charts, diagrams, photographs, etc.) are also to be inserted directly into the text, but should not be copied and pasted. If you copy-and-paste an image, it may look correct on your screen, but it will not be carried through to the final submitted manuscript, and publication of your manuscript will be delayed. To insert a figure, use the Image icon at the top of the text box.

Specifications for Figures:
  • Figures should be as clear as possible. If figures are not clear, they may cause your manuscript to be rejected by the indexing systems.
  • Each individual Figure should not be larger than 5 Mb.
  • If figures are wider than 500 pixels, they may overflow in your preview screen, but this is only because the preview screen is limited by screen dimensions.
  • It is important for you to correctly set and shape your images before uploading.  The submission form should not be used as an image editor.
  • Figures must be in .jpg or .png formats.
 See our Use of images in manuscripts policy for further guidance.

13. Abbreviations

When used for the first time, all word abbreviations and acronyms should be expanded with the abbreviation indicated in brackets - e.g. Problem-Based Learning (PBL).  Thereafter, the abbreviation can be used.  Abbreviations of standard units of measurement may be used without writing them out. Metric measurements should be used.

14. Very Long Articles

While a word limit is not enforced strictly, we suggest that authors avoid submitting articles with more than 5,000 words. Over this figure greater editorial discretion is applied, because of the work required in formatting, peer review and editing. Authors face a greater risk of rejection with a request to be more concise. The art of writing is to be succinct in communicating a clear message, although qualitative research may need more extensive interpretation and discussion.

If you have a very long article with many extras, such as curricula or teaching schemes, then please consider including these as appendices so that the actual article is shorter and easier to read.

15. Questionnaires and Data Sets

Authors are encouraged to publish their questionnaires as appendices. In some cases, anonymised data sets may also be published. If authors wish to do this, they need to clarify under which circumstances their questionnaires, datasets, etc. may be used by other researchers.

16. Themed Articles

We are no longer publishing themed issues, however we will from time to time collate previously published articles within a themed collection. If you wish your article to be considered for a particular theme, please take extra care when selecting Categories and Keywords as these will be used by the Editors to identify potential themed content.

17. Pre-prints

MedEdPublish is published online only.  No pre-prints or galley proofs are provided, and the responsibility is on the corresponding author to ensure that all information is correct.
In addition to some automatic field-checking performed by the MedEdPublish system, you will:
  • be presented with a checklist of fields to check that all information has been entered, and
  • be able to preview (and revise) the manuscript.
You then submit the manuscript.

18. Fees and Fee Structures

MedEdPublish aims to keep fees as low as possible. Articles can be submitted free of charge for editorial consideration but if accepted will only be published subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC). This covers the administrative cost of processing and publishing your manuscript, including editorial checks, hosting, typesetting and other aspects of production, as well as technical development and maintenance of the publishing platform and administrative support during peer review.
NOTE: Manuscripts may still be rejected after payment of the APC if the authors fail to comply with any of the changes required by our editorial team within the specified time period, or if serious issues are identified after acceptance which would render the manuscript unpublishable. This fee is non-refundable so please ensure you have read the relevant guidance before payment:

19. Publication, Reviewing and Responding to Reviews

After submission, the article will be evaluated by the MedEdPublish editing team, including the Editor, Associate Editors or Theme Editors. This is done to ascertain that the article:
  • is in readable and intelligible English;
  • is within the scope of the journal. That is, the article concerns health professions’ education;
  • is in a format (e.g. research article, case study etc.) acceptable to the journal, and
  • includes an appropriate ethics statement for all reports of research or evaluation of educational interventions, and any other papers (such as case studies) where students or patients or other subjects may be involved.
  • does not infringe copyright or data protection laws
If additional information is necessary from the corresponding author, this may delay publication.  Possible reviewers from the Review Panel will be allocated.  During this time, MedEdPublish procedures will conform to all aspects of confidentiality as outlined in ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, Updated December 2017, available at:
If basic minimum requirements have been met, the article is then published as a permanent publication, is allocated and registered with a unique DOI, is visible to the world, and cannot be edited or retracted by the authors.  
Following publication, the reviewers post their reviews and give their star ratings.  These reviews are visible on the same page as your article.
As author, you have the opportunity to respond to reviewers’ comments, especially if you need to clarify issues. In fact, MedEdPublish encourages you strongly to continue the conversation with your reviewers.  This will improve the overall quality of the article, and will allow readers to have the benefit of extra remarks and comments that you wish to make.
Please bear in mind that your comments will be visible and will be part of a permanent record associated with the article. As a result, especially if the reviewers have commented negatively on your article, you should take your time in formulating a reply.  Please use the reviewers’ comments as formative feedback for improving your article (see next section).

20. Submitting a Revised Version of your article

After you have read (and responded to) the reviews, you may submit a revised version of the article, taking into account these reviewers’ comments and star ratings.   

Please note that:
  • You may not submit a revised version of the article until a period of 28 days after publication of the first version.  This is to ensure that reviewers have had enough time to review the first version, and that authors take the reviewers’ comments into account.
  • The article must have received a minimum of two Panel member reviews.. 
Also, please note the following:
  • The initial article will have been published with its own unique DOI.
  • The revised article is published with a new unique DOI, but readers will have access to the original article and all reviews and comments that are posted for the original article.
  • Changes should be in response to reviews submitted for the original article, should focus on addressing substantive issues raised by reviewers, and aim for improvement of the original article.
  • The title of the revised article should remain the same as for the original article, except where specifically suggested by reviewers.
  • The number, order and names of authors should remain the same as in the original except where changes are made to address specific reviewers’ comments.
  • The word count should remain the same (+/-10%) except where reviewers’ comments specifically suggest expansion of a section of the original article.
  • The citation list should remain the same (+/-10%) except where the reviewers’ comments specifically suggest stronger links to the literature.
  • Revisions should not address solely grammatical and spelling errors, although these may be addressed if the revision addresses substantive issues raised by reviewers.
  • All revisions will go through a further review process, including reviewers of the original article, and will receive published reviews and star ratings that are independent of those of the original article.  It is possible that a revision will receive negative reviews and a lower star rating than the original version.
If you elect to submit a revised version, a new template will open, and will be auto-populated with some of your previous information.  You may edit any of the fields.
Fields that will be pre-populate from the original article will be:
  • Title
  • Authors (with the ability to add or remove authors)
  • Other ancillary fields, such as Abstract, Take Home Message, Notes on contributors, Bibliography/references, and Appendices.
Main body fields, the new MS-Word document and supplementary files will not be copied over, and will have to be re-entered by the author.
Authors will also have to complete a text box labelled Amendments from Version 1.  As it implies, this information is a summary of the differences between Version 1 and Version 2 (the revised version) of the article only.  Authors must not supply a detailed point-by-point response to each of the reviewers’ comments.  Please note that this information will be attached to the revised version of the article, so that readers will be able to pick up differences at a glance. This will also help reviewers of the new version to look for the changes that were recommended, and so more quickly and easily perform their reviews.

21. Advertising your article

Authors are requested not to advertise the submission of their manuscripts until the article has been published.  This is to avoid inappropriate anticipation and queries to you and the MedEdPublish office.
After publication, MedEdPublish promotes the article by email to registered users who have indicated an interest in a matching category.  At the end of each week, an email is sent to all MedEdPublish Panel Members listing any articles which have been published that week in their categories of interest.  Approximately every two months, a selection of highly rated articles (usually 4 stars and above) are listed in Medical Teacher.

Due to the volume of articles published, we are unable to promote every individual article on social media.  We do strongly encourage authors to promote their own work on social media platforms as our analytics show that this can be a highly effective way to increase article visibility.  Authors are also encouraged to advertise their own articles within their institutions, and/or any other places where they deem such advertising to be appropriate.  Our Creative Commons license means that authors are free to distribute as many copies (electronic or printed) of their article as they wish for teaching, research or any other purpose without any special permissions.

22. Retraction of articles by MedEdPublish

At any stage of the publication process (even after publication and review), an article may be retracted by MedEdPublish.  This is performed only under exceptional circumstances, such as:
  • Plagiarism;
  • Unethical practices, including defamatory material and listing authors without their knowledge or consent;
  • Any type of data fabrication or misrepresentation;
  • Duplicate submission of article to MedEdPublish;
  • Identification of a very similar article in another journal, and
  • Requests by authors, but only if authors have identified serious errors that compromise the integrity of the article.
Please note the retraction process of MedEdPublish conforms to the COPE Retraction Guidelines, available at:

23. Articles not receiving peer-reviews

MedEdPublish is a fully-fledged post-publication peer-reviewed journal, and not a pre-print server. Once an article goes ‘live’ online in MedEdPublish it is considered ‘published’ in the same way as if it had been printed in a traditional journal. We will facilitate the peer review process for all published articles, but as with any publisher, we cannot guarantee that peer review is completed in a specific time frame.
Once an article is published, it cannot be reverted to preprint status or taken down except in specific circumstances outlined in our retraction policy. It will retain its permanent DOI and will be registered with Crossref which means the content will be detectable by similarity-checking software employed by most academic publishers.

24. Retention of all original submissions

If the manuscript is accepted, all original material submitted by the author will be retained by MedEdPublish for up to 3 years.

25. Copyright

Authors retain full copyright on their submissions.  Authors have permission to deposit all versions of their article in any open or closed-access institutional or other repositories (including pre-print (i.e. pre-refereeing) and post-print (i.e. final draft post-refereeing), and final published version in HTML, XML, PDF or any other format), as long as all the original publication details and DOI of the article is retained.  DOIs are permanently stored with CrossRef.

All user-submitted manuscripts, reviews and comments are published under Creative Commons "CC BY-SA 4.0" (  This permits all users to “copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially”  on condition that correct attribution is given, all changes are clearly indicated, and the new material is published under the same license.  All other contents of this website, including logos, are the property of MedEdPublish. 

26. Depositing of final articles in other repositories

Authors have permission to deposit final versions of their articles in any institutional or other repositories, as long as all the original publication details and DOI of the articles are retained.  DOIs are permanently stored with CrossRef.

27. Open Access

MedEdPublish is an entirely open-access journal.  This means that all contributions (articles, reviews, comments, etc.) are open to the public for viewing, downloading and use in terms of the "CC BY-SA 4.0" licence.