Research article
Open Access

Study Habits of Medical Students: An Analysis of which Study Habits Most Contribute to Success in the Preclinical Years

Jenny Liles[1], Jasna Vuk[2], Sara Tariq[1]

Institution: 1. University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, 2. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Corresponding Author: Dr Jenny Liles ([email protected])
Categories: Educational Strategies, Research in Medical Education, Teaching and Learning
Published Date: 12/03/2018

Abstract

Academic performance during the first two years of medical school is an important predictor of success on the United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1. Research is lacking into what study methods successful students use, with success being defined as achieving a grade point average of above 90% in all or in most of the courses in the preclinical years.This study sought to identify specific study habits that successful students use and to demonstrate an association between preclinical grades and Step 1 scores. In this study, an anonymous survey was sent to first, second, and third year medical students that included various questions about their study habits, as well as their course grades (A, B, C, or fail) and, if applicable, their Step 1 score. Results demonstrated statistically significant differences existed between Step 1 scores and grades in the second year of medical school, with A students earning higher scores. A students tended to attend class, limit use of online lectures, study for 6-8 hours a day, and review lectures the same day they were given significantly more than B and C students did. This study demonstrates that certain study habits are employed consistently by successful students. These study habits should be shared with medical students early in the preclinical years to help students reach maximum potential both in class and on Step 1, which in turn will allow students to match into their choice of residency.

Keywords: study habits; USMLE preparation; medical student education

Introduction

Methods

Results/Analysis

Discussion

Conclusion

Take Home Messages

  • Grades during the first two years of medical school are important predictors of success on USMLE Step 1. Study habits of students who are successful in their preclinical courses is therefore of interest to medical educators.
  • Students who make all or mostly A’s attend class, limit use of online lectures and outside resources, study for 6-8 hours a day, and review lectures the same day they are given.
  • Students who make more B’s and C’s are more likely to not attend class, make frequent use of online lectures, study for 3-5 hours a day, and not review lectures the same day they are given.
  • These study habits should be shared with medical students and medical educators alike so that students can maximize their full potential in the preclinical years, which in turn will help them perform well on Step 1 and match into a residency of their choice.

Notes On Contributors

Jenny Liles, M.D. is currently completing her preliminary year of training in Internal Medicine at the University of Tennessee for Health Sciences Center in Memphis, TN. Next July she will began her residency in Dermatology at Medical College of Georgia in Augusta, GA. She has a passion for medical education and hopes to continue to make teaching a part of her career.

Jasna Vuk, M.D, Ph. D. is an Associate Professor in the Division of Academic Affairs, Student Success Center at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Sara Tariq, M.D., is the Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Clinical Education and Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Acknowledgements

Bibliography/References

Abdulghani, H. M., Al-drees, A. A., Khalil, M.S., Ahmad, F., Ponnamperuma, G. G., & Amin, Z. (2014). What factors determine academic achievement in high achieving undergraduate medical students? A qualitative study. Medical Teacher, 36 (Suppl l), S43-S48.

https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.886011    

Alton, S. (2016). Learning how to learn: Meta-learning strategies for challenges of learning Pharmacology. New Education Today, 38, 2-4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.003

Arnold, L., & Feighny, K. M. (1995). Students' general learning approaches and performances in medical school: A longitudinal study. Academic Medicine, 70(8), 715-722.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199508000-00016   

Coumarbatch, J., Robinson, L., Thomas, R., & Bridge, P. D. (2010). Strategies for identifying students at risk for USMLE step 1 failure. Family Medicine, 42(2), 105-110.   

D'Antoni, V. A., Zipp, G. P., Olson, V. G., & Cahill, T. F. (2010). Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students? BMC Medical Education, 10, 61.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-61   

Dort, J. M., Trickey, A.W., Kallies, K. J., Joshi, A. R., Sidwell, R. A., & Jarman, B. T. (2015). Applicant characteristics Associated with selection for ranking at independent surgery residency programs. Journal of Surgical Education, 72(6), 123-129.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.021   

Eisen, D. B., Schupp, C. W., Isseroff, R. R., Ibrahimi, O. A., Ledo, L., & Armstrong, A.W. (2015). Does class attendance matter? Results from a second-year medical school dermatology cohort study. International Journal of Dermatology, 54(7), 807-816.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.12816   

Fink, J. L. (2010). Why we banned use of laptops and "scribe notes" in our classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(6), 1-2.   

Go, P. H., Klaassen, Z., & Chamberlain, R. S. (2012). Residency selection: Do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match? Medical Education, 46(5), 491-500.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04257.x   

Gravetter, F. J. & Wallnau, L. B. (2007). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (7th Ed). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.   

Gunn, K. P. (1993). A Correlation between attendance and grades in a first year psychology class. Canadian Psychology, 34(2), 201-202.

https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078770

Hammen, C. S., & Kelland, J. L. (1994). Attendance and grades in a human physiology course. Advances in Physiology Education, 267(6), S105-8.

https://doi.org/10.1152/advances.1994.267.6.S105   

Hojat, M.I., Gonnella, J. S., Erdmann, J.B., & Veloski, J. J. (1996). The fate of medical students with different levels of knowledge: Are the basic medical sciences relevant to physician competence? Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 1(3), 179-196. doi: 10.1007/BF00162915.   

Hu, Y., Martindale, J. R., LeGallo, R. D., White, C. B., McGahren, E. D., & Schroen, A.T. (2016). Relationships between preclinical course grades and standardized exam performance. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 389-399.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9637-6 

Kim, K., Turner, S. A., & Pérez-Qui-ones, H. M. A. (2009). Requirements for electronic note taking systems: A field study of note taking in university classrooms. Education and Information Technologies, 14(3), 255–283.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9086-z   

Kotrlik, J. W., Williams, H. A. (2003). Incorporation of effect size in information technology learning and performance research. Information Technology Learning and Performance Journal, 21, 1-7. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e5c3/504ca4baef11c1cda8ec085833dbccb63259.pdf 

Kumar, A. D., Shah, M. K., Maley, J. H., Evron, J., Gyftopoulos, A., & Miller, C. (2015). Preparing to take the USMLE Step 1: A survey on medical students' self-reported study habits. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 91(1075), 257-261.

https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133081   

Le, T., & Bhushan, V. (2015). First Aid for the USMLE Step 1 2015 (25th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical.   

Mehta, C. R., & Patel, N. R. (2010). IBM SPSS Exact Tests. New York: SPSS. Retrieved from: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/pdfs/SPSS_Exact_Tests_21.pdf   

Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159-1168.  

https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581   

Murre, J. M., & Dros, J. (2015). Replication and analysis of Ebbinghaus' forgetting curve. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0120644.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120644   

Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2010). Performance of college students: Impact of study time and study habits. The Journal of Education for Business, 85(4), 229-238.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903449550

Nyamapfene A. (2010). Does class attendance still matter? Engineering Education, 5 (1), 64-74.

https://doi.org/10.11120/ened.2010.05010064

Ogenler,O., & Selvi H. (2014). Variables affecting medical faculty students' achievement: A mersin university sample. Iran Red Crescent Medical Journal, 16(3), e14648.

Park, K. H., & Kerr P. M. (1990). A determinant of academic performance: A multinomial logit approach. Journal of Economic Education, 21 (2), 101–111.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1181978

Piolat A., Olive T, & Kellogg R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during notetaking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291-312.

https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086

Romer, D. (1993). Do students go to class? Should they? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 167–74.

https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.3.167   

Stacy, E. M., & Cain, J. (2015). Note-taking and handouts in the digital age. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(7), 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe797107   

Subramaniam, B. S., Hande, S., & Komattil, R. (2013). Attendance and achievement in medicine: Investigating the impact of attendance policies on academic performance of medical students. Annals of Medical & Health Sciences Research, 3(2), 202–205.

https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.113662   

Vidler, D. C. (1980). Curiosity, academic performance, and class attendance. Psychological Reports, 47 (2), 589-590.

https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1980.47.2.589   

Von Blerkon, M. L. (1992). Class attendance in undergraduate course. The Journal of Psychology, 126 (5), 487–94.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1992.10543382   

West, C., Kurz, T., Smith, S., & Graham L. (2014). Are study strategies related to medical licensing exam performance? International Journal of Medical Education, 5, 199-204.

https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5439.6491   

Zhang, C., Rauchwarger, A., Toth, C., & O'Connell, M. (2005). Student USMLE step 1 preparation and performance. Advances in Health Science Education 9(4), 291-297.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-004-3925-x

Appendices

Declarations

There are no conflicts of interest.
This has been published under Creative Commons "CC BY-SA 4.0" (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

Reviews

Please Login or Register an Account before submitting a Review

Alyss Robinson - (09/04/2018)
/
This was a simple yet highly insightful retrospective cohort study assessing patterns of study behaviour in relation to grades as an outcome. The findings are interesting, and help to discourage the philosophy that the pre-clinical years “don’t matter”. The primary outcome was to assess whether pre-clinical grades were congruent with final exam performance, which they were. Secondary outcomes aimed to analyse the efficacy of study habits, namely to identify superior methods so that students “may be forced to find new ways to study effectively”, in order to “reach their full potential”. The main findings highlighted that students scoring the highest grades in exams seemed to attend lectures, review lectures and spend 6-8 hours studying outside of scheduled teaching.

It would be valuable if the authors described the examination schedule in greater depth; how many examinations do students take? How often? How are they weighted? This is important because a student may consistently score C grades in smaller frequent examinations but one A grade in a major end-of-year examination, for example. This would also help with generalisability. Also are the distributions of grades of study participants comparable to the medical school, or could there be a potential survey bias?

The authors speculate that students achieving A grades are attending lectures, and then spending 6-8 hours reviewing the lectures from that day at home. It would be useful if they had elucidated how students were spending their private study time from the survey. This would further the study as it would suggest that thoroughly covering the lecture material is key for exam success, which is one theory postulated in the discussion.

One minor grammatical comment; there should be no apostrophe when describing grades, it should be As, Bs and Cs not A’s, B’s and C’s.

The definition of a successful student was a student achieving all or mostly A grades. While not within the realms of this study design, more reflection and discussion was required to emphasise that successful students are not limited purely by exam performance. More so in later years, students may be furthering their academic profile; publishing papers, attending conferences and teaching students which would occupy time otherwise spent studying. However, these activities would make the student more successful in other domains.

More reflection was also needed on potential reporting bias. The numbers of students within each group would be useful to enable the reader to assess the sample sizes. The median/mean hours studied or the absolute number of lectures attended/watched/caught-up per week would be more useful than the categories provided to statistically compare groups, however this is understandably difficult to elucidate in a questionnaire and would be better assessed in prospective work.

Overall this was a very interesting read which evokes interesting thought and discussion. Thank you.
PATRICIA CURY - (16/03/2018)
/
This is a very interesting work! I wonder how the sutdents study 6-8 hours daily. Is it out of the university ? In my contry medical course is from 8 AM to 6 PM. Was the study only with Med students from University of Arkansas? How long they spend their time in class? Is it PBL?
Juan Cendan - (16/03/2018) Panel Member Icon
/
This is an important contribution to the current medical education literature. Just this week, an article was published ahead of print in Academic Medicine touting a universal (and proximate) medical education curriculum platform. It is critical that medical educators come to grips with the avalanche of technological advances that are competing for students' attention and that we engage with these and understand how to curate these resources while complementing the experience for our learners. The paper is well-written. The overall numbers are good; but warrant corroboration at multiple sites. The information is very useful.
Julie Hunt - (13/03/2018) Panel Member Icon
/
This retrospective study analyzes self-reported student data about their study habits and correlates those with their grades. The graphs in the paper beautifully describe what the statistics showed: increasing grades with lecture attendance and daily review of lecture material, and decreasing grades with use of online lecture viewing to replace in-person attendance and re-watching of lectures. Like some of the other studies on this topic, it offers further support for what many of us academics have been telling our students.

I agree with the previous reviewer who pointed out a number of confounders exist. Given that it was a retrospective study, it shows association but not causation. For example, the students who missed daily lectures and relied on online lectures may be those who also have family, job, or health issues that take away from their study time.
John Cookson - (12/03/2018) Panel Member Icon
/
This is an interesting study but as with similar reports, there may be a confounder at work. Thus B and C students may have other issues which are reflected both in their study habits and their grades. Adoption by them of the study habits of A students (even assuming they are able to do so) may not lead to improvement.