Review of the literature
Open Access

Medical Professionalism Across Cultures: A Literature Review

Laith Yasin[1], Gerald R. Stapleton[1], L. J. Sandlow[1]

Institution: 1. University of Illinois at Chicago
Corresponding Author: Mr Laith Yasin ([email protected])
Categories: Professionalism/Ethics
Published Date: 21/10/2019

Abstract

The review aims to identify the cultural perspectives of medical professionalism by identifying relevant literature from the Middle East, East/South Asia, and the Western world that discuss definitions. A literature search was conducted using the “Summon” search engine, and 200 articles sorted by relevancy were manually reviewed. Based on the surveys and documents gathered from each of the regions, the definitions seem to be fairly consistent in their recognition of characteristics important to the concept of medical professionalism. These include several characteristics, with some of the most common being personal character, respect for patient autonomy, responsibility, and social obligations; the main difference lies in emphasis with the West focusing on societal issues and patient rights, the Middle East focusing on morality and personal character, and East Asia focusing on respect, responsibility, and other duties. These differences are reviewed and the cultural sources are further expanded upon. 

  

Keywords: Medical Professionalism; Ethics; Cultures

Introduction

The development of a common definition of medical professionalism has been elusive for centuries. Definitions have continuously evolved as a result of changing philosophies regarding ethics. Most evidently, the Middle East, East/South Asia, and the Western world have taken different approaches to developing an overall definition of medical professionalism. Historical evidence of the definitions includes oaths and codes. More recently contributions to the definition have been assisted by surveys, scholarly reports, and syntheses of viewpoints from the ABIM, CanMEDS, and other organizations. In reviewing this evidence, we attempt to identify key documents that have impacted the interpretation of medical professionalism in various cultures through history.

Methods

A search of the literature using the “Summon” search engine was utilized to assure that the full text of each article in the database was indexed so that all articles that included references to the search terms would be included and not just those with such terms in their titles or keyword indices. A search of English language articles appearing over the last 10 years with full text available online appearing in scholarly journals and books was performed using the keywords “medical ethics” and “codes” and “history”. This initial search yielded 56,271 books and articles including many that were focused on nursing and pharmacy.  The authors narrowed the focus to medical practice by a second search excluding the keywords “Nursing”, “Nurses”, and “Pharmacy”. The second search yielded 25,910 articles. These articles were sorted by relevance using the Summon search metrics and the 200 articles and books that were determined to be most relevant were manually reviewed by the lead author with the intention of identifying references to key sources that were regarded as influential in establishing the meaning and interpretation of medical professionalism through history and across cultures. No new documents were identified in the final quarter of the selected search results leading us to conclude that the sample selected was satisfactory to identify the key sources of influence through history and across various cultures.

Findings and Discussion

Western Definitions

 

The Western definition of professionalism has been extensively documented in the literature and source documents show clear signs of evolution as a result of changing cultures and ideas. In Western cultures, the Hippocratic Oath has regularly been recognized as a key milestone in the development of medical professionalism, laying a groundwork for the explicit description of physician responsibilities.  Charles Bryan’s analysis (Bryan, 2011) of the development of medical professionalism references four pivotal events, the Hippocratic Oath being the first to occur, followed by the conception of medical ethics, the Flexner Report, and the commoditization of medicine. Bryan emphasizes the importance of developing a definition of medical professionalism in each generation, in order to defend medicine’s status as a “learned profession” (Bryan, 2011). However, in a study conducted by Fabrice Jotterand (Jotterand, 2005), the relevance of the Hippocratic oath is questioned. Jotterand notes that many view the Hippocratic oath’s influence to be diminished in contemporary medicine, due largely to outdated views on morality (Jotterand, 2005). On the other hand, defense of the oath’s influence largely refers to its symbolic status as a foundation of medical ethics. Further, the author notes various arguments that rest on the implied social and political obligations of the oath, as well as its implied leaning towards a universal healthcare system (Jotterand, 2005). Overall, Jotterand asserts the importance of developing an overall philosophy of medicine, in order to substantiate the principles described in the oath (Jotterand, 2005).

 

In an article assessing the development of professionalism through various oaths and codes, Garrick Applebee cites the Hippocratic oath as the first major event in the progression of medical professionalism (Applebee, 2016). He further notes that the oath was generally seen as a personal oath prior to the Middle Ages, when it became a standard for professionalism in medical schools (Applebee, 2016). Similar to Bryan’s article, Percival’s “Medical Ethics” and the Flexner Report were also cited by Applebee as key milestones, with the addition of other codes, like Sun Simiao’s oath, the AMA code of ethics, and the ABIM physician charter (Applebee, 2016). The documents show a progression in the specific attributes, moving from duties of the physician to concepts like patient rights and social justice (Applebee, 2016). In an article (Cohen 2006) aiming to develop a definition of professionalism, Cohen mentions the effects of the Hippocratic Oath, Maimonides, and William Osler to show the ubiquity of certain aspects of professionalism; namely, the “primacy of patient interest”. This generally conflicts with the idea that the Hippocratic oath has been mostly phased out, as it shows the clear retention of major concepts over the course of history.

           

The comparisons between the Hippocratic oath and modern professionalism are further elaborated on in an article by Friedrich Heubel (Heubel, 2014), in which the concepts of patient welfare and self-determination are determined to be consistent between the oath and the ABIM charter on professionalism. However, the main difference stems from the concept of social justice detailed in the charter, calling for fairness in the distribution of health resources. As noted previously, some defenders of the oath claim that universal health care is implied within the oath. The explicit call for social justice in the ABIM charter represents a notable difference, however, regardless of the deeper interpretation of the Hippocratic oath.

           

More recently, the AMA Code of Ethics has been a key example of the contemporary view of medical professionalism in the West, with several revisions in the past two centuries. As Baker and Emanuel describe in an article (Baker and Emanuel, 2000) analyzing the AMA Code’s relevance, the code put patients’ interests above the professional, following the tradition set by the Hippocratic Oath. The authors also emphasize the most common themes, primarily the focus on the physician-patient relationship and the obligation to advise the public in all matters (Baker and Emanuel, 2000). Notably, in an article discussing medical malpractice and medical professionalism by Klaas et al. (Klaas et al., 2014), a substantial change was observed in the 1980 revision, with the change from “not speaking ill of a physician’s competence” to an obligation to “report physicians deficient in character or competence”. This shows a general trend toward less protection for physicians and an increasing emphasis on giving patients the best care possible.

           

Many have accepted the ABIM physician charter as a modern definition of medical professionalism and the charter’s attributes are often used as a starting point for a Western definition. The charter outlines three fundamental principles, Primacy of Patient Welfare, Patient Autonomy, and Social Justice, along with several professional responsibilities.

 

Not all have viewed the ABIM charter uncritically. In a critique of the physician charter (DeAngelis, 2015), DeAngelis cites the difficulty in pinpointing a definition that includes all the attributes one would expect of a physician. In particular, the article emphasizes the lack of the term “compassion” in the physician charter, despite its prevalence in definitions around the world, as noted by the studies in East Asia and the Middle East reviewed below (DeAngelis, 2015). DeAngelis notes the potential for physicians to place the welfare of the institutions employing them over the care of their patients (DeAngelis, 2015).  Swick et al. describe the primary problem with the physician charter to be its basis as a contract (Swick et al., 2006). The authors explain that the reference to the physician-patient relationship as a contract connotes a formal agreement based on distrust, further supported by the restrictive tone of the charter (Swick et al., 2006). With an attitude of distrust between physicians and patients, physicians may provide care more rigidly, focusing on their legal obligations rather than on optimizing care for the patient. Further, the authors describe the value of medical oaths to the profession, as providing a basis for morality and medical professionalism which in turn acts to prevent the commercialization of medicine (Swick et al., 2006). Clearly, Western professionalism is centered around the maintenance of the profession, focusing on physician autonomy and the physician-patient relationship in an effort to limit the commercialization of medicine and the risk of a more business-oriented distribution of healthcare.

              

The CanMEDS definition of professionalism is another highly regarded representative of the Western ideals. The differences between this definition and the ABIM Charter is described in Reid’s article (Reid, 2011) regarding medicine as a social contract. Generally, the physician charter lays out the obligations of the physician to society. In contrast, the CanMEDS definition represents more of an exchange between physicians and society, describing the obligations and expectations of both parties (Reid, 2011). While this does more in terms of giving physicians more autonomy, preventing the potential for rigid, strict medical practice, it still contain the same problems associated with trust detailed in Swick’s previously mentioned article. This exchange detailed in the CanMEDS definition was notably derived from Richard and Sylvia Cruess’ definition of professional roles, which CanMEDS adopted in response to calls by the Canadian public for limitations on physicians in the 1980’s (Reid, 2011).

 

In an effort to gain a different perspective on medical professionalism, Chandratilake et al. conducted a survey (Chandratilake et al., 2010) of a representative sample of the American public and found that, as expected, the public placed the most importance on concepts regarding patient rights, such as patient autonomy and confidentiality. The least emphasis was placed on physician interactions with colleagues and teamwork related attributes (Chandratilake et al., 2010). It is noteworthy, however, that the public listed all kinds of attributes, which the author separates into three categories: clinicianship, workmanship, and citizenship (Chandratilake et al., 2010). Thus, though the emphasis on particular attributes varies between the public and physicians, the general public still recognizes the obligations of physicians to patients, colleagues, and society. The modern tone for professionalism places much more emphasis on physician relationships beyond the typical doctor-patient interactions, with social obligations becoming prominent in most definitions of Western professionalism.

           

Other sources for prominent definitions are reviewed in an article by Hilton and Southgate (Hilton and Southgate, 2007), showing the strong influences of attributes laid out by Swick, Calman, and Epstein, each of whom push for a normative definition of medical professionalism. These approaches generally focus on the attributes of the physician, as opposed to a contract-based structure. These attributes include several that align with public opinion, such as respect for patients and responsibility to the patient and society. They also comprise the personal aspects of professionalism, detailing the need for physicians to have focus and attention, actively managing their mental approach to patient care (Hilton and Southgate, 2007).

 

Middle Eastern Definitions

           

While many common definitions of medical professionalism are based on Western values, having originated mainly in Europe, the Middle East generally has taken an Islamic perspective on the basic values outlining the concept (Kasule, 2013). According to Kasule, the Islamic definitions emphasize seven basic values, consisting of: faith, consciousness, best character, excellent performance, striving toward perfection, responsibility, and self-accountability, as opposed to the three primary principles of professionalism and various professional responsibilities outlined in the ABIM physician charter (Kasule, 2013). As Kasule states, the primary difference between the two proposed definitions lies in the Islamic emphasis on morality and personal character, specifically a humble attitude and sincerity in human interactions (Kasule, 2013). However, definitions of professionalism in the Middle East rely heavily on the religious background, as religion plays a large role in perspectives of morality and ethics.

             

Al-Eraky et al., in a survey of medical students from universities in Egypt and Saudi Arabia (Al-Eraky et al., 2013), found that students placed the most importance on concepts generally related to “respect for others”, which included both patients and the healthcare team. Meanwhile, the lowest overall scores of importance were generally found in the “honor/integrity” related concepts, which centered primarily around disclosure of information relevant to the patient (Al-Eraky et al., 2013). While the Arabian context was the focus of the survey, the characteristics surveyed were derived mainly from the ABIM. Nonetheless, the student emphasis on respect in relationships seems to fall in line with the Islamic definition’s emphasis on personal character and human interactions Kasule outlines (Al-Eraky et al., 2013). In a survey of advanced Kuwait medical students (Al-Abdulrazzaq et al., 2014), Al-Abdulrazzaq et al. found that Kuwait students most commonly defined aspects of professionalism related to punctuality, respect, and attire, with the least common attributes being skill, wisdom, and considerate behavior. The survey analysis used CanMEDS competencies as a framework to assess the student definitions, which showed students placing most emphasis on ethical behavior, while lacking in areas related to physician health and social involvement regarding regulation (Al-Abdulrazzaq et al., 2014). The authors state the prevalence of “respect” was seen throughout similar studies, as described previously in Al-Eraky and Kasule’s results regarding Islamic and Arabian definitions of medical professionalism, depicting the historical influence of Muslim medicine from the Islamic-Arabic Golden Age.

           

Al-Eraky et al. formulated an Arabian definition to eight attributes based on medical experts’ opinions from universities in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Sudan. These attributes were then sorted in a Four-Gates Model, with the broader categories being: dealing with self, dealing with tasks, dealing with others, and dealing with God (Al-Eraky et al., 2014). The qualities derived from the expert responses were compared to Western definitions using the ABIM Physician Charter and other scholarly reports, sharing characteristics such as respect, accountability, and excellence (Al-Eraky et al., 2014). The primary difference between the study results and the Western definitions was the fourth “gate”: dealing with god, which placed emphasis on self-accountability and self-motivation in relation to core religious values of Islam (Al-Eraky et al., 2014). In modern Western texts, aspects of religion in medical professionalism have not been discussed in great detail, though, in contrast, they play a central role in Arabian definitions of medical professionalism.

           

Al-Eraky and Chandratilake further propose an Arabian definition of medical professionalism based on a panel of healthcare professionals from institutions in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates (Al-Eraky and Chandratilake, 2012). The results indicated an overall acceptance of the ABIM Physician Charter’s six domains, while further adding “autonomy of professionals” to the list (Al-Eraky and Chandratilake, 2012). Though all domains were rated highly, honor/integrity received the highest score of importance, while excellence received the lowest (Al-Eraky and Chandratilake, 2012). This is contrary to Al-Eraky’s survey mentioned previously, in which medical students in the same region gave the lowest importance rating to the same category. The addition of autonomy of professionals emphasizes the power given to physicians in regards to decision-making, as opposed to the western practice of giving more power to patients in that respect (El-Eraky and Chandratilake, 2012). Overall, the modern definition of medical professionalism in the Middle East, as indicated by the surveys conducted and definitions proposed, aligns with the ABIM, with amendments in the form of religious addendums and an emphasis on personal character.

           

Similarly, modern Jewish Medical Ethics, as described by Jotkowitz in an article outlining the contributions of Rabbi Moshe Feinstein (Jotkowitz, 2014), has been shaped heavily by religious principles. Themes have shifted towards more patient-centered care, with patient autonomy and informed consent being a key emphasis (Jotkowitz, 2014). Perspectives on euthanasia, abortion, artificial reproduction, and other areas have been commonly dictated by Jewish Law, though the modern interpretations have shifted and allowed for development of new principles of medical ethics (Jotkowitz, 2014). Thus, the impact of religious texts and ancient sources is evident in similar fashion to the Islamic approach to medical professionalism.  The religious aspects are further evidenced by Maimonides Prayer, which focuses on duties of the physician, emphasizing their character and intention. The prayer also was one of the earliest to include the obligations of the physician to recognize their uncertainty and limitations, and to continuously pursue knowledge.

 

East/South Asian Definitions

           

Much of the literature regarding East Asia’s perception of medical professionalism is similarly in the form of surveys of students and professionals. In a survey of Korean physicians conducted by Kim and Choi (Kim and Choi, 2015), it was found that duties, such as veracity and responsibility were held in higher regard than virtues, such as altruism and honesty. The authors also state that the healthcare system in place, which is heavily government-led, has resulted in loss of autonomy for physicians, creating a more rigid practice and diminishing characteristics like altruism (Kim and Choi, 2015). Interestingly, the author also cites the impact of Confucian thought, particularly on older physicians. Confucian thought emphasized the concept of Zi Zhong, which has been generally related to integrity, indicating the source of the higher importance rating for the concept among older physicians (Kim and Choi, 2015). In an article assessing the historical development of medical professionalism in Korea (Hahm and Lee, 2012), Hahm and Lee claim that Confucianism shaped early ethics, focusing on social positions and responsibilities. Ethics continued to develop, focusing primarily on physician etiquette, with the revisions of the Korean Medical Association’s Doctor’s Code of Ethics failing to instill an “ethics tradition” into the practice (Hahm and Lee, 2012).

           

In a comparison of two Chinese contexts, Ho et al. surveyed Chinese and Taiwanese students and physicians’ opinions on a framework to define medical professionalism (Ho et al., 2014). Between the two contexts, the primary difference was the Chinese preference of “morality” as a core competency in place of “integrity” preferred by the Taiwanese (Ho et al., 2014). The authors cite the similarities of the Taiwanese and Chinese frameworks for professionalism as being rooted in Confucianism, evidenced by the prominence of morality and integrity. The survey also showed the distinction from Western professionalism, as the both Chinese cultural groups placed more emphasis on morality and personal/social roles, citing the CanMEDS competencies as an example for the lack of attention to personal factors (Ho et al., 2014). The authors also cited the economic considerations of the Chinese group as opposed to the lack of acknowledgement from the Taiwanese participants, referencing the regions respective healthcare policies as a probable explanation (Ho et al., 2014). That is, Chinese opinions were observed to be clearly influenced by economic policy that was unique to mainland China, showing distinction from Taiwan.

           

Other surveys of Chinese and Taiwanese students and physicians further depict the East Asian perspective of medical professionalism. In a survey of first-year Chinese medical students (Jiang et al., 2010), Jiang et al. shows a strong emphasis on ethics when defining the attributes of professionalism. It is further noted that the attributes gathered from the student responses generate a simplified response when compared to the perspective of professionals, as expected with their limited experience (Jiang et al., 2010). Similarly, in a sample of seventh year Taiwanese students, Tsai et al. discovered that students place the most emphasis on accountability and respect (Tsai et al., 2007). Notably, however, the scores were all relatively high in terms of importance, with more emphasis on the more broad aspects of professionalism in terms of patient interactions (Tsai et al., 2007). Meanwhile, in a study of thirteen occupational groups (volunteers, students, public health experts, physicians, etc.), Pan et al. noted different levels of value associated with aspects of professionalism, depending on their professional status (Pan et al., 2013). Of all the surveyed groups, clinical competence was consistently ranked the most important attribute, with groups showing main differences in the addition of attributes like self-management, teamwork, and health promotion (Pan et al., 2013).

           

In a survey of Chinese physicians, Nie et al. determined cross-cultural differences and commonalities between as compared to American attitudes on professionalism (Nie et al., 2015). The survey found that Chinese physicians generally supported the principles of the ABIM Physician Charter, primarily focused on issues of consent, full disclosure, and patient autonomy (Nie et al., 2015). The authors determined that Chinese culture and medical ethics are generally compatible in regards to moral expectations.

In a review of medical professionalism research published in the Chinese language, Wang et al. identified four main themes of research: teaching professionalism, practicing professionalism, conceptualizing professionalism, and teaching professionalism (Wang et al., 2016). In their conceptualization, Chinese authors typically examine professionalism in either religious or political contexts (Wang et al., 2016). Philosophies of traditional Chinese medicine are derived from Confucian or Taoist thought, and authors make the argument that their values, such as benevolent practice, self-discipline, and harmony, should make up the foundation of medical professionalism (Wang et al., 2016). The Chinese Communist’s Party’s values were also analyzed, as authors aligned the core socialist values, such as freedom, justice, and rule of law, to core principles of medical professional ethics, such as autonomy, beneficence, and justice. Wang et al. concluded that the in terms of conceptualizing a definition, the primary concern was moving towards prioritization of patient welfare over self-interest (Wang et al., 2016).

           

One example of a Chinese Code of Ethics was outlined in an article, where Ip analyzed the development of medical ethics in the 1990’s (Ip, 2005). In this Code of Conduct, relationships of the physician were emphasized, giving a framework for physician conduct with patients, colleagues, and society (Ip, 2005). Notably, the code was very general, making the measure of one’s professionalism and ethical performance more subjective. Interestingly, the Code of Conduct does not seem to correlate with the responses from the surveys of Chinese students and professionals described previously, indicating that the very general tone may have led to failed implementation or accountability of the standards outlined.

           

In contrast, the Indian Code of Ethics analyzed in an article by Benner has more specific standards, and a focus more on physician duties than relationships (Benner, 2005). However, it does share the same principles of respect for patients, colleagues, teachers, and all other relationships (Benner, 2005). Over the course of the 1900s, the principles have not changed significantly, though the wording has been adjusted to be more politically correct. Benner also notes that India generally aimed to align with international standards in order for physicians trained to practice worldwide (Benner, 2005). Thus, their Code of Ethics closely follows the standards of the World Medical Association, which focus on the duties of the physician in general, and to their patients (WMA, 2018).

           

The East Asian definition of medical professionalism shows a strong emphasis on respect, responsibility, and other duties, with less focus on the state of physicians themselves in terms of personal health. More evidently, the literature suggests slight differences in the definition of medical professionalism between different groups, with more emphasis on attributes more relevant to their given status, notably with students as opposed to practicing physicians.

             

In 2008 and 2009, one of us (LJS) surveyed the faculty of four medical schools regarding their definition of Professionalism. The schools included Chiba University School of Medicine in Chiba, Japan; Shanghai College of Medicine in Shanghai, China, Princess of Naradhiawas University Medical School in Thailand, and Jordan University of Science and Technology School of Medicine in Jordan. The faculties were asked to list those characteristics that they felt defined the term “Professionalism”. Of note, the Chiba Dean informed him that there was no word for Professionalism in Japanese. These surveys were performed within a workshop session and the characteristics were summarized and then discussed as well as applied in some case studies. The results of these sessions were compared to the responses of US residents in their online learning module on professionalism. In general, the faculty of the 4 medical schools in the Middle East and Asia agreed with the characteristics provided by the GME residents in the United States, which included integrity, altruism, responsibility, confidentiality, and leadership among other characteristics commonly associated with medical professionalism.

Conclusion

Based on the surveys and documents gathered from each of the regions, the definitions seem to be fairly consistent in their recognition of characteristics important to the concept of medical professionalism. These include several characteristics, with some of the most common being personal character, respect for patient autonomy, responsibility, and social obligations. The main difference lies in emphasis, where the Western definition focuses on societal issues and patient rights, the Middle East focuses on morality and personal character, and East Asia focuses on respect, responsibility, and other duties. Some of this distinction comes from the potential separation of medical professional characteristics into what Cruess and Cruess outlined as traits of the healer, and those of the professional (Cruess, Cruess, and Steinert, 2009). While some regions may focus primarily on the professional characteristics, others may place more emphasis on the healer, leading to the absence of characteristics when determining a definition for medical professionalism.

Take Home Messages

  • Much of the difference in Medical Professionalism across cultures lies in emphasis rather than definition
  • Western definition emphasizes societal issues and patient rights
  • Middle East definitions emphasize morality and personal character
  • East/South Asian definitions emphasize respect, responsibility, duties

Notes On Contributors

Laith Yasin, MD Candidate 2020, is a student at the University of Illinois College of Medicine.

 

Gerald R. Stapleton is a member of the faculty in the Department of Medical Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago where he served as the Director for Distance Education from 1999 through 2018. 
 

L. J. Sandlow, MD is Emeritus Professor of Medicine and Medical Education in the College of Medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago.  He was previously the Senior Associate Dean for Academic & Educational Affairs and the Head of the Department of Medical Education at the College of Medicine, UIC. 

Acknowledgements

None.

Bibliography/References

Al-Abdulrazzaq, D., Al-Fadhli, A. and Arshad, A. (2014) ‘Advanced medical students’ experiences and views on professionalism at Kuwait University,’ BMC Medical Education, 14(1). http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-150

 

Al-Eraky, M. M. and Chandratilake, M. (2012) ‘How medical professionalism is conceptualised in Arabian context: A validation study,’ Medical Teacher, 34(sup1). http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.656754

 

Al-Eraky, M. M., Chandratilake, M., Wajid, G., Donkers, J. and Merriënboer, J. V. (2013) ‘Medical professionalism: Development and validation of the Arabian LAMPS,’ Medical Teacher, 35(sup1). http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.765553

 

Al-Eraky, M. M., Donkers, J., Wajid, G. and Merrienboer, J. J. G. V. (2014) ‘A Delphi study of medical professionalism in Arabian countries: The Four-Gates model,’ Medical Teacher, 36(sup1). http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.886013

 

Applebee, G.. (2006). ‘A brief history of medical professionalism - And why professionalism matters.’ Contemporary Pediatrics. 23. pp. 53-54+56.

 

Baker, R. and Emanuel, L. (2000) ‘The Efficacy of Professional Ethics The AMA Code of Ethis in Historical and Current Perspective,’ The Hastings Center Report, 30(4). http://doi.org/10.2307/3527657

 

Benner, D. (2005) ‘The Medical Ethics of Professionalised Āyurveda,’ Asian Medicine, 1(1), pp. 185–203. http://doi.org/10.1163/157342105777996791

 

Bryan C. S. (2011). ‘Medical professionalism meets generation X: a perfect storm?’. Texas Heart Institute journal38(5), 465–470.

 

Chandratilake, M., Mcaleer, S., Gibson, J. and Roff, S. (2010) ‘Medical professionalism: what does the public think?,’ Clinical Medicine, 10(4), pp. 364–369. http://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.10-4-364

 

Cohen, J. J. (2006) ‘Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: from evidence to accountability,’ Medical Education, 40(7), pp. 607–617. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02512.x

 

Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R. and Steinert, Y. (2008) Teaching medical professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Deangelis, C. D. (2015) ‘Medical Professionalism,’ Jama, 313(18), p. 1837. http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.3597

 

Hahm, K.-H. and Lee, I. (2012) ‘Biomedical Ethics Policy in Korea: Characteristics and Historical Development,’ Journal of Korean Medical Science, 27(Suppl). http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2012.27.s.s76

 

Heubel, F. (2014) ‘The ‘Soul of Professionalism’ in the Hippocratic Oath and today,’ Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 18(2), pp. 185–194. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9589-2

 

Hilton, S. and Southgate, L. (2007) ‘Professionalism in medical education,’ Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(3), pp. 265–279. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.024

 

Ho, M.-J., Yu, K.-H., Pan, H., Norris, J. L., et al. (2014) ‘A Tale of Two Cities,’ Academic Medicine, 89(6), pp. 944–950. http://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000240

 

Ip, P.-K. (2005) ‘DEVELOPING MEDICAL ETHICS IN CHINAs REFORM ERA,’ Developing World Bioethics, 5(2), pp. 176–187. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2005.00112.x

 

Jiang, S., Yan, Z., Xie, X., Tang, W. et al. (2010) ‘Initial knowledge of medical professionalism among Chinese medical students,’ Medical Teacher, 32(12), pp. 961–970. http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2010.497827

 

Jotkowitz, A. (2014) ‘The Seminal Contribution of Rabbi Moshe Feinstein to the Development of Modern Jewish Medical Ethics,’ Journal of Religious Ethics, 42(2), pp. 285–309. http://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12057

 

Jotterand, F. (2005) ‘The Hippocratic Oath and Contemporary Medicine: Dialectic Between Past Ideals and Present Reality?,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 30(1), pp. 107–128. http://doi.org/10.1080/03605310590907084

 

Kasule, O. H. (2013) ‘Medical professionalism and professional organizations,’ Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 8(3), pp. 137–141. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2013.09.003

 

Kim, S. and Choi, S. (2015) ‘The Medical Professionalism of Korean Physicians: Present and Future,’ BMC Medical Ethics, 16(1). http://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0051-7

 

Klaas, P. B., Berge, K. H., Klaas, K. M., Klaas, J. P. et al. (2014) ‘When Patients Are Harmed, But Are Not Wronged: Ethics, Law, and History,’ Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 89(9), pp. 1279–1286. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.05.004

 

Nie JB, Smith KL, Cong Y, Hu L, et al.(2016). ‘Medical Professionalism in China and the United States: A Transcultural Interpretation.’ J Clin Ethics. 26(1):48–60.

 

Pan, H., Norris, J. L., Liang, Y.-S., Li, J.-N. et al. (2013) ‘Building a professionalism framework for healthcare providers in China: A nominal group technique study,’ Medical Teacher, 35(10). http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.802299

 

Reid, L. (2011) ‘Medical Professionalism and the Social Contract,’ Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 54(4), pp. 455–469. http://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2011.0048

 

Swick, H. M., Bryan, C. S. and Longo, L. D. (2006) ‘Beyond the Physician Charter: reflections on medical professionalism,’ Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49(2), pp. 263–275. http://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2006.0026

 

Tsai, T.-C., Lin, C.-H., Harasym, P. H. and Violato, C. (2007) ‘Students’ perception on medical professionalism: the psychometric perspective,’ Medical Teacher, 29(2-3), pp. 128–134. http://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701310889

 

Wang, X., Shih, J., Kuo, F.-J. and Ho, M.-J. (2016) ‘A scoping review of medical professionalism research published in the Chinese language,’ BMC Medical Education, 16(1). http://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0818-7

 

WMA - The World Medical Association-WMA International Code of Medical Ethics (2018) The World Medical Association. Available at: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-international-code-of-medical-ethics/ (Accessed September 2019)

Appendices

None.

Declarations

There are no conflicts of interest.
This has been published under Creative Commons "CC BY-SA 4.0" (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

Ethics Statement

This is a review of literature and ethics that did not use human or animal subjects so approval was not sought.

External Funding

This article has not had any External Funding

Reviews

Please Login or Register an Account before submitting a Review

Judy McKimm - (05/11/2019) Panel Member Icon
/
I read this paper with interest and note the comments of other reviewers also. I learned some new aspects about professionalism which probably reflects the way in which the search was carried out. Great to see a medical student included as an author as well.
I think this would be improved by some summary tables, especially contrasting the different regions, there are some missing regions (Africa, South America, Australasia) and also I would think some papers regarding indigenous peoples from around the world could have been included.
As noted, one of the main contrasts is between countries/regions that are more or less secular and there is a shift in many western countries towards a more secular society so the societal contract is changing between doctors and society.
A useful addition to our understanding of professionalism.
P Ravi Shankar - (25/10/2019) Panel Member Icon
/
Thank you for the invitation to review this interesting paper. The authors have compared medical professionalism across western, Middle Eastern and East Asian cultures. The article is well written and the quality of written English is good. I am also happy to note that the first author is a medical student.
One reason for the possible differences could be the diminishing role of religion in western and East Asian societies. In the west since the middle ages the role of religion is diminishing in most regions though exceptions remain. In China the Communist party has tried to reduce the role of religion in everyday life. The issue is more complex however if we look at it in terms of geographical areas. With migration to the west from other regions western thought and philosophy is also getting influenced by Asian thought processes. I am happy that Jewish philosophy is also briefly addressed in the Middle East section. The Middle East has seen a lot of migration from other regions in recent times. In the East Asian section there are other minority cultures like the Tibetan and the Islamic traditions which may have their own perspectives on professionalism. Also due to the economic growth in East Asia migration from other regions including the west is happening which can influence cultures and traditions. In the modern world due to ease of communication and transfer of thoughts and ideas various cultures are more easily able to influence one another.
The article mainly addresses professionalism in terms of published research. The article is long and I believe that figures and a few tables summarizing important aspects of the discussion would be useful. This is an important paper dealing with a topic of vital importance to all educators.
Junichi Tanaka - (23/10/2019)
/
I read it very interestingly. I wanted to recommend a paper written by Dr. Nishigori about Japanese professionalism and Bushido.

Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):560-3. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000176.
Bushido and medical professionalism in Japan.
Michelle McLean - (23/10/2019) Panel Member Icon
/
The primary author of this publication is a student. Congratulations for grappling with a convoluted topic. I had to concentrate while reading the body of the paper but the Conclusion is succinct and draws out the main difference (emphasis not difference). For someone starting out in the field, I think that this will be a useful summary of some of the key considerations when interpreting the reams of publications in the area.

Noting the concerns of previous reviewers, I would still recommend this for those working in the field.
Possible Conflict of Interest:

No conflict of interest

PATRICIA CURY - (22/10/2019)
/
It is a very interesting review, many information about different cultures, but I missed african and south American point of view...
Trevor Gibbs - (21/10/2019) Panel Member Icon
/
An interesting and topical paper that draws some interesting conclusions, much of which are not surprising but does add to our literature on the topic.
I suppose I was somewhat unsure of the authors' approach to the review- what made the choose the slightly unusual Summon engine- was there a particular advantage of using this search engine over the more usual approaches. I was confused somewhat regarding the key words originally used - why history? and also the exclusion of papers not in the English language, particularly when looking at variants from different coutries and cultures.
I learned much from the introductory section which provides a useful set of background reading and very useful to those looking at the topic of professionalism.
Possible Conflict of Interest:

For transparency, I am one of the Associate Editors of MedEdPublish