Review of the literature
Open Access

The COVID-19 pandemic and undergraduate medical student teaching/learning and assessment

Ian Wilson[1], Pathiyil Ravi Shankar[1][a]

Institution: 1. International Medical University
Corresponding Author: Prof Ian Wilson ([email protected])
Categories: Education Management and Leadership, Teaching and Learning, Basic and Foundation Sciences, Clinical Skills
Published Date: 11/02/2021


Medical colleges closed in most countries in February-March due to the coronavirus pandemic and the need to ensure physical distancing. Many rapid changes to teaching/learning and assessment were carried out. Articles published on medical education during the pandemic were analyzed to answer three questions: What changes to undergraduate medical student teaching/learning have occurred during the last six months? What modifications to undergraduate medical student assessment have occurred during the corresponding time period and what are students’ perceptions regarding these changes? English language articles published during the current year till 10th July were searched using the terms ‘pandemic’, ‘coronavirus disease’, ‘COVID-19’, ‘undergraduate medical education’, ‘medical student assessment’ and ‘medical schools’. The online databases PubMed and Google Scholar were searched. The journal AMEE MedEdPublish was also searched. Articles dealing mainly with postgraduate education, continuing medical education, institutional preparedness, early graduation and joining the workforce were excluded.

After narrowing down according to the selection criteria, and addressing duplication, a total of 62 unique articles were obtained. A total of 44 articles were on undergraduate teaching /learning during the pandemic and 10 articles mainly focused on assessment. A total of 8 articles mentioned student experiences of teaching/learning and assessment during the pandemic. Medical education migrated online during the pandemic. The transition may have been smoother for preclinical students as the content could be delivered remotely more easily. Moving clinical learning online has greater challenges. Medical students, especially in developing countries face greater challenges to learn remotely. Open book assessments have been used. E-portfolios, projects, exams with remote proctoring, online OSCE, online structured viva-voce have been carried out. Student perception about these changes were mixed. They were happy about being able to continue learning but maintaining focus and sustaining interest were challenges. Clinical learning has been particularly affected.   

Keywords: Assessment; Coronavirus disease; COVID-19; medical student; perception; teaching/learning; undergraduate


The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by a novel coronavirus, now named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) has caused widespread global disruption. As of 15th July 2020, a total of 1.3 million cases have been reported globally and 578,628 individuals have lost their lives (COVID-19 map Johns Hopkins Corona Virus Resource Center, 2020). Most nations had closed their medical schools and colleges in February/March and some are beginning to reopen them now partially for on-site clinical learning.

A number of extremely quick modifications to teaching/learning and assessment were carried out to maintain continuity of education during the pandemic. In the absence of effective treatments and vaccines, social distancing measures have been recommended for disease control (Sandars et al., 2020). A number of articles have been published about teaching/learning in medicine, changes to assessment, and student experiences during the pandemic. In this article, the authors analyze and synthesize the published English language literature to answer three important questions. These are:

What changes to teaching/learning have happened in undergraduate medical education during the last six months?

What modifications to student assessment in undergraduate medical education have taken place during the corresponding time period?    

What are undergraduate student perceptions regarding these changes?


A review of published English language articles during the current year (2020) till 10thJuly 2020 was carried out using the search terms, ‘pandemic’, ‘coronavirus disease’, ‘COVID-19’, ‘undergraduate medical education’, ‘medical student assessment’ and ‘medical schools’. The databases PubMed and Google Scholar were used for the search. The online journal AMEE MedEdPublish has a large collection of articles in this area and the site was separately searched using these terms. Some of the AMEE MedEdPublish articles were also retrieved using the Google Scholar database. Majority of the articles in the COVID-19 collection are freely available online and the full text of the articles were carefully read by the authors. Articles focusing on the three questions to be addressed were included. Challenges to providing online teaching/learning and assessment were included. Studies about faculty perceptions regarding online teaching/learning and assessment were also included. Articles dealing mainly with postgraduate education, continuing medical education, institutional preparedness, early graduation and joining the workforce were excluded. We also excluded articles focusing on faculty preparation for online teaching/learning and assessment.  

Results and Discussion

Using the search criteria outlined in the Methods section a total of 146 articles were obtained. Twenty-two articles were duplicates. Twenty-four articles primarily focused on institutional preparedness and organizational matters and contribution by the institution to the surrounding community. Fifteen articles primarily focused on postgraduate and continuing education. Fourteen mainly emphasized faculty development, three dealt with conference or workshop adaptation and three addressed how to use your time effectively during the pandemic. Three articles dealt with early graduation and student perceptions about joining the workforce during the pandemic.

We obtained a total of 44 articles on undergraduate teaching /learning during the pandemic and 10 articles mainly focusing on assessment. A total of 8 articles mentioned student experiences of teaching/learning and assessment during the pandemic. Thus, a total of 62 unique articles were retrieved relevant to this study.

Table 1: Details of the articles included in this review



Articles by medical students


Country where the authors were working




United States of America


United Kingdom










Saudi Arabia


New Zealand






























Subtopics addressed by education-related papers

Learning design

Migrating to online learning

Subject specific

Clinical education


Telehealth & GP

Curriculum Opportunities & challenges

Impact on countries


Institutional responses

Peer learning


Narrative medicine















Type of article

Original research articles

Experience sharing

Letters to the editor


Perspective & tips








Four articles were entirely written by medical students. Nine articles had authors from more than one country. Authors working in the United Kingdom and the United States had the maximum number of published articles. Three articles were preprints. Subject specific papers dealt with anatomy, neuroanatomy, general surgery, otorhinolaryngology, dermatology, ophthalmology among others. Four manuscripts concentrated on clinical education in general while eight from the title of the paper focused on the impact of the pandemic on medical education in a country. Two papers detailed institutional responses (including modifications to teaching/learning and assessment) while two others focused on peer learning. There were eight original research articles mainly surveys of students and faculty, twelve were experience sharing articles either from departments or institutions while eighteen articles provided perspectives and tips.

What changes to teaching/learning have happened during undergraduate medical education?

General considerations:

Medical education has migrated online and various delivery platforms are being used. Academic medical centers should establish a COVID-19 response team which can manage various challenges associated with the pandemic in a timely manner (Ashokka et al., 2020). Among the major tasks with regard to medical education delivery are managing and coordinating remote or decentralized learning, and maintaining the integrity of formative and summative assessments while patient contact is at a minimum. For medical students during the preclinical years in developed countries the transition has been smoother as online delivery was already an important part of the curriculum (Hilburg et al., 2020). However, small group learning sessions and workshops during which students interact with faculty and peers have been impacted and been replaced by sessions using video conferencing software. A number of platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Blue Jeans are being widely used. In some schools, this software was already being used along with learning management systems (LMS) while in many schools, especially in developing countries free versions of the software with reduced functionality are being used.

A recent article provides tips to educators to shift teaching/learning rapidly online (Sandars et al., 2020). The authors rightly mention that online learning is a rapidly growing collection of methods and technologies rather than a single, compact entity. Organizational support is required and the existing LMS should be used. Lectures should be broken down into multiple components and polls and activities are useful to maintain student interest. A flipped classroom approach is strongly recommended. If technical requirements can be met synchronous platforms are to be preferred. Asynchronous discussion forums and tutorials are also important. The optimal use of social media to communicate with students, provide feedback and reduce anxiety is important (Sandars et al., 2020). Content sharing tools, such as Hootsuite ( or Buffer ( enable educators and students to schedule and automatically post in multiple chosen platforms saving precious time. Students can be encouraged to co-create content and busy clinicians should be on board and convinced about the benefits of online learning.  Similar recommendations were provided by another article which also mentions about co-creation of content, enhancing online teacher presence, delivering content as interactive modules, using flipped learning methods, providing timely feedback and supporting healthy group work (Reyna, 2020). Students need support for online learning.

Technology plays an important role in learning and can be used for online delivery as mentioned previously. Even post-pandemic, technology will continue to play an important role in learning (Goh and Sandars, 2020). Adaptive learning provides a personalized approach to learning for all students and informs educators how students are learning particular topics. The time for developing individual competence can be reduced. Extended reality, which includes virtual and augmented reality and haptic stimulation is also likely to play an important role. The anytime, anywhere approach can extend learning to students who may be disadvantaged. Open educational resources which are freely available to educators and students globally can reduce costs (Goh and Sandars, 2020). Institutions, especially in low and middle income countries can face particular challenges in using technology for learning (Cecilio-Fernandes et al., 2020). Students may not have a dedicated space for learning at home and internet access could be an issue. Students may have to share resources with other family members. The use of podcasts may be a suitable approach. Lectures can be recorded and uploaded on learning portals for students to download at leisure. Asynchronous modes of delivery may also be useful.

Response of countries and institutions to maintain teaching/learning:

The biggest medical school in Mexico appears to have faced the challenge well incorporating a variety of e-learning approaches (Fernandez-Altuna et al., 2020). In Nepal online theory classes are being conducted for medical students despite various challenges and the authors conclude that half a loaf of bread (some amount of online learning) is better than none (Atreya and Acharya, 2020). In Egypt, a survey among faculty and the educational leadership revealed a dichotomy of opinion with the leaders grading the institutional response much better compared to faculty members (Shehata et al., 2020). An editorial from India discusses various adaptations to learning during the pandemic and highlights the challenges of shifting clinical learning online (Pattanshetti and Pattanshetti, 2020). In Italy, the authors found that online teaching may be adequate for the preclinical, basic sciences but the challenge was providing practical clinical teaching and the blurring of boundaries between work and home leading to concerns of privacy (Bianchi, Gatto and Fabiani, 2020). In Turkey lectures were shifted online while practice courses, exams and the internship were shifted to the summer term (Tokuç and Varol, 2020). The authors mention how our success against infectious diseases had led to a predominant focus on chronic diseases in the medical curriculum.  Many of these articles with titles mentioning a country perspective, in reality provided information from a limited selection of institutions within the country. The experiences of two institutions, Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia (Veasuvalingam and Goodson, 2020) and the School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (Samarasekera et al., 2020) provide ideas and strategies which can be adapted by other institutions. The major ideas are creating an institutional taskforce, empowering a working group with major responsibility for online teaching/learning and assessment, faculty development, preparing students for online learning, involving all stakeholders, sharing timely and relevant information and obtaining feedback from both students and faculty.

Changes to preclinical curriculum:

The majority of articles deal with the subject of anatomy. Cadaveric dissection is not being conducted and the risk of transmission of the virus through cadavers has put a stop to body donations with a consequent shortage of cadavers (Ravi, 2020). A number of online platforms are now available for anatomy learning and there is a vigorous debate about their value and effectiveness as compared to traditional dissection (Franchi, 2020). The author mentions that students’ fine motor skills, feelings of team work, emotional intelligence and empathy are all catalyzed in the anatomy laboratory through interactions with different individuals. The development of prosected specimens, image libraries and videos by departments are also recommended. At the University of Southampton in the UK, the SotonBrainHub website with its associated YouTube channel and Instagram account has been hosted since 2014  and is well appreciated by students (Hall, and Border, 2020). A strength, weakness, opportunity, threat (SWOT) analysis of adaptations to Anatomy education in the UK and Ireland was carried out (Longhurst et al., 2020). To conduct online sessions and create educational material, educators, have to invest considerable amount of time learning new technology. Digitized cadaveric resources and 3-D anatomy models are being used by an increasing number of schools. There is increased collaboration between anatomy departments and an upskilling of faculty. The rapidity with which the pandemic developed created time constraints as there was not enough time to learn new technologies and create learning resources. With absence of face-to-face interaction there are challenges to the student-teacher relationship which has also been mentioned by other authors.

Clinical teaching/learning:

Due to absence of clinical exposure maintaining the quality of clinical teaching/learning has been a major challenge. Various areas have been addressed in the recent literature. In the US, ‘away’ surgical rotations in specialties not available at the student’s home institution play an important role in stimulating student interest in a residency in the subject and for programs to select suitable residents (Boyd et al., 2020). Short virtual exposures and providing more detailed information about rotations on the institutional website have been recommended. Digital clinical placements, virtual wards and similar innovations have been proposed by many authors. In a medical school in the UK, students receive a weekly set of online interactive cases which they review in detail. During a webinar with the specialty clinician the case is discussed and analyzed (Sam et al., 2020). At the University of Pennsylvania in the US, a virtual otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery rotation was implemented consisting of interactive, live-streamed surgeries, telehealth outpatient visits, and virtual small group sessions (Chao et al., 2020). First person video technology was used in this and some other institutions so that the observer can see the field of view of the primary surgeon. Students may have been able to spend more time with the attending surgeon virtually than was possible during face-to-face sessions.

At the University of Newcastle in Australia, live streamed ward rounds were used as a replacement for traditional rounds (Pennell et al. 2020). The rounds had three phases. During phase one a particular student observes the live stream carefully using a mobile, and formulates case presentations during the second phase. This is followed by the presentation phase where the student presents each patient sequentially to the faculty and a small group of students. In Hong Kong videos and written materials were used to supplement online small group sessions. Simple ophthalmic examination skills were taught and students could ask questions of the instructor using private messages (Shih et al., 2020). Teaching direct ophthalmoscopy using this method was however difficult. In New Zealand, e-learning programmes were created to replace general practice attachments during the lockdown (Roskvist, Eggleton and Goodyear-Smith, 2020). Ten interactive e-learning cases were created which could be completed asynchronously. Microsoft teams was used during undergraduate dermatology teaching and video lectures, real time discussion and document sharing were employed (Nic and Murphy, n.d.). To take care of communication issues and provide support a specialist registrar in dermatology was allocated as a point of contact. In US medical schools, interactive platforms providing reviews of surgical anatomy, surgical procedure walkthroughs, practice test questions, and intricate patient cases are used to provide students with opportunities to practice differential diagnoses skills and improve clinical reasoning (Ehrlich, McKenney and Elkbuli, 2020).

These methods were originally developed to supplement in-person learning which occurs in a clinical setting and not as standalone activities. Real-life clinical activities are more interactive, visual and demonstrative (Jeyakumar et al., 2020). Point of view filming which was discussed earlier was recommended using wearable filming technologies. Issues of privacy, consent, cost, feasibility and data security have to be addressed.

Telehealth, narrative medicine and peer learning:

Telehealth and telemedicine will play a more important role moving forward. The pandemic improved knowledge of evidence-based medicine among students with better knowledge of the link between modes of virus transmission and choice of preventive measures, and how knowledge of disease pathophysiology helps in choice of treatments (Fourtassi et al., 2020). In the current context simulation based medical education can be used to train students regarding proper donning and removing of personal protective equipment (PPE) and simulation sessions can be broadcast online (Deng, Wang and Tsui, 2020). Virtual reality technology if available can strengthen simulation delivery.

Peer learning can play an important role during the pandemic. With different social isolation measures in operation, students feel lonely and vulnerable. Peer learning can teach time management, self-regulated learning, team work and group management skills. At a medical college in Saudi Arabia, students were encouraged to form pairs and small groups according to their choices (Hamad, Iqbal, Alothri, Alghamadi, and Elhelow, 2020). Regular meetings significantly improved students’ sense of responsibility for their own learning. Improvement in problem solving potential, support to shift to newer methods of learning, and improved motivation was seen. Peer learning supported students to adapt better to technology-enhanced learning. In a UK medical school tutoring sessions by senior students were shifted online (Roberts et al., 2020). Promoting interaction between the tutor and students during online sessions was a challenge as has been mentioned in other studies and publications. The sessions were recorded for later viewing and tutors also provided real-life examples from wards to enhance student learning.

At Columbia University in the US facilitators of a narrative medicine workshop were challenged to transfer workshop online while still maintaining critical reflection by the participants as the pandemic progressed (Iwai and Lusk, 2020). The curriculum was modified to focus on creative texts and personal well-being and the length of the workshop shortened. Most participants reacted postively though challenges with internet connection were mentioned.

To sum up many schools have been able to shift a good proportion of teaching/learning online. Shifting clinical teaching/learning online is more challenging. Different initiatives have been tried in this regard. Student engagement during sessions and learning from home are challenges. Internet connectivity, internet stability and availability of computers, laptops and tablets to access the sessions were also noted. 

What modifications to student assessment have taken place?   

Compared to the number of studies describing innovations in teaching/learning, those describing modifications to student assessment were less common. Some schools have shifted summative assessment to a later date after the situation improves (Tokuç and Varol, 2020). An article highlighting the need to rethink assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic was published recently (Sabzwari, 2020). In today’s world access to knowledge is not a problem and assessing and interpreting knowledge is important. Higher order levels of knowledge and problem-solving skills should be tested. For written examinations multiple venues may have to be created and if a single venue is to be used then social distancing requirements may require a larger space. E-portfolio can be an important method to assess the attainment of different competencies by students and older methods like viva-voce can be modified for the purpose of online assessment. Locally developed virtual patients will depict regional and local disease patterns and cultural contexts.

An assessment clock has been developed considering the five parameters which influence the utility of assessment including validity, reliability, educational impact, acceptability and cost or feasibility (Wadi et al., 2020). The clock incorporates the stakes of the exam (low or high stakes) and whether the situation is normal or an emergency condition along with the five parameters mentioned to help planners decide on the most important ones they should focus on during the crisis situation. For students at an earlier phase of the program, assessment can be carried out differently or postponed as there is no immediate impact on progression (Fuller et al., 2020). There is a learning curve for new methods of assessment which requires enough time and opportunities are available for both students and faculty to familiarize themselves. Well-designed open book tests and assignments are recommended and should use clinical cases and problems which cannot be easily solved using internet searches or textbooks. Software systems to monitor students and reduce cheating while they are giving exams at home using their own equipment have seen an increase in demand. Systems which lock down computers, require fingerprint and biometric identification, provide panoramic views of the room where the candidate is taking the exam and which track eye movements have been developed. There are ethical, privacy and other issues associated with their use. Student generated photos, voice tags and media clips have been mentioned as evidence for engagement with assessment, and peer or assessor commentary can be provided using shared documents or online spaces.

Open book assessments (OBA) testing higher order skills have been mentioned previously. Students’ perspective about OBA from King’s college, London was published (Mathieson, Sutthakorn and Thomas, 2020). The authors were of the opinion that the summative OBAs used were a fair measure of their knowledge and the platform used allowed them to flag and annotate questions and come back later to unanswered questions. The question order was randomized and the time limit for the exam did not allow time to consult with others. Frequent OBAs may reduce the anxiety associated with exams. An online learning portfolio can monitor the technology used, faculty performance and satisfaction with online teaching, student engagement, student satisfaction, and student achievement through pre and post-test quizzes and reflections (Alrefaie, Hassanien and Al-Hayani, 2020). During an online viva the assessor/teacher can play the role of a patient from whom the student obtains a history and mentions about relevant physical examinations.

An objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is widely used to test clinical competence. At the National University of Singapore a high-stakes OSCE was conducted in a COVID-19 environment (Boursicot et al., 2020). Among the key principles which were applied were strict infection control and personal protection measures, segregation of participant groups, social distancing and physical separation of different cohorts, zoom facilitated briefings, wi-fi enabled data gathering and not allowing people to congregate in large groups. At a medical school in Bahrain virtual clinical assessment was conducted using an online platform (Shehata et al., 2020). Among the recommendations by the authors were to understand the available logistics, develop an assessment plan, assign a task force, build capacity and design the necessary forms, conduct mock examinations, maintain constant communication among team members during the exam, and define the process evaluation indicators. The online software has the features of pre-exam room, panels where the exam is conducted and a post-exam room. Recording capability and co-hosting features are very important. A virtual, high-stakes, summative pediatrics OSCE was conducted at the Uniformed Services University in the US using similar principles (Lara et al., 2020). The duration of time for each clinical encounter was 22 minutes, after which the examinee left the “exam room.” They then had 13 minutes to write a post encounter note while faculty and simulated patients (SPs) completed their assessments of the student. On completing the post encounter note, students were then returned to the “hallway” to read their subsequent “doorway folder”. They then proceeded into the next “exam room”. Altogether the students saw four cases.

Thus, formative quizzes, written exams using remote proctoring, open book exams, spotters, structured viva-voce and virtual OSCEs have been developed for student assessment. Assessments which are not high-stakes and during the earlier years of the course have been postponed in many locations. High-stakes OSCE has been conducted using a blended method in some institutions.

Let us now try to answer the final question.     

What are student perceptions regarding these changes?

Medical students have been deployed during previous pandemics, especially the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918 and early graduation of medical students has been seen in some countries. At a Canadian medical school year 3 students helped with contact tracing, telephone helplines and supported faculty members with childcare and shopping chores (Leong and Sarohia, 2020). Students find motivation by engaging with these volunteer duties and are concerned about adapting to different changes to the curriculum and teaching/learning. Student perceptions about the effectiveness of e-learning compared to conventional learning was studied in an Indian medical school (Kaur et al., 2020). Students rated the e-classes to be equally effective with regard to communication, contributing to skills and knowledge, offering better understanding and in grooming for a professional career. With regard to convenience, interaction level, individual learning needs and balancing of practical and theoretical knowledge students found e-learning sessions to be less effective. The student opinion was more negative at a medical college in Pakistan where over 75% of students had a negative perception of online learning and 86% felt it had little impact on their learning (Abbasi et al., 2020). Over 75% used mobiles to access the e-learning sessions. The authors mention that student perception regarding e-learning is mixed with both positive and negative opinions. In Brazil students were anxious, happy about the ability to continue their education through online methods, but only few of them enjoyed it (Peloso et al., 2020). Students opined that the learning of clinical material would be impaired and it could prolong their course. The greatest challenges they faced involved establishing a study routine due to distractions and absence of a suitable place to study at home. Learning in the absence of faculty members was another challenge and only 21% of students wanted online learning activities to continue post-quarantine.

An Indian medical student was of the opinion that learning of online skills by faculty and applying the same during student sessions played an important role in reducing the stress and anxiety faced by the student community (Chatterjee, 2020). Issues with internet connectivity, audio and video quality and background noise were mentioned by other students and the author recommends doubt clearing sessions, virtual bedside simulation software, and methods to increase student engagement. In the UK, examinations for a large proportion of students were completed by the time lockdowns were enforced but over 75% of elective clinical placements were cancelled and the student assistantship period was also severely disrupted (Choi et al., 2020). Around 60% of students agreed that they felt less prepared for foundation year 1. Six UK medical schools changed the final year summative examination to be done remotely. The students recommend creating a robust system for standardization of online exams and clear guidance about extenuating circumstances while attempting the exam. In the US a nation-wide survey was conducted among students interested in neurosurgery to understand their concerns and educational interventions mentioned to ensure continued educational development (Gaudix et al., 2020). Students shared concerns about conferences and networking opportunities, clinical experience, subinternships and clinical research experience. Virtual mentorship programs, virtual surgical workshops, webinars and virtual symposia were suggested. 

An electronic survey of currently enrolled medical students at Duke-NUS medical school in Singapore was conducted early in the pandemic. The survey focused around a conceptual framework of students’ preferences for returning to the clinical setting (Compton et al., 2020). Nearly 65% of students mentioned that if possible, they would like to return to the clinical setting. The preference varied according to year of study, students perceived professional identity, self-motivation and concern about causing harm to patients and the healthcare system. In the UK, a twitter-based survey about student concerns regarding the COVID-19 pandemic was carried out following a one-hour national twitter discussion (Huddart et al., 2020). Among other concerns students mentioned that remote learning could impact their ability to develop clinical competences. There were differences in the extent to which individual medical schools involve their students in tackling the pandemic.

Thus electronic, remote learning provides students with an opportunity to continue their learning during the pandemic. But problems with staying focused on and engaged with the sessions were noted. Providing clinical learning in the absence of patient contact remains a major challenge. Virtual support and mentorship were considered useful.

Limitations: The articles included were from two databases and from the online journal, MedEdPublish. Newspaper and magazine articles dealing with these topics were not included. Preprints were included and only publications in English were considered. Only articles published on or before July 10th were included.


A number of initiatives have been carried out to sustain undergraduate medical student learning during the pandemic using different electronic platforms. The major challenge has been to sustain clinical learning in the absence of patient contact. Extended reality technology can be considered. Virtual simulation may have an important role to play. Issues of internet access, lack of electronic devices, absence of a quiet place to study or sit an exam without distractions have to be kept in mind. With regard to assessment written exams are being carried out through online platforms with an integrity pledge or remote proctoring. Open book exams have also been tried. Online structured viva-voce, and online OSCE for assessment of clinical skills have been done. Student feedback about online learning and assessment has been mixed. Developing a learning schedule and engagement and motivation were challenges.

A return to clinics and community placements can be considered under adequate personal protection and social distancing norms as soon as circumstances permit. Summative, high-stakes clinical assessments can be conducted using all necessary precautions. The pandemic can be used to highlight the importance of investing in health, epidemic control, community medicine and the urgent requirement to invest in development of newer antimicrobials. Studies on the effectiveness of online learning methods and online assessments should be conducted. Blended learning is likely to be common even after the pandemic. Greater cooperation between institutions, countries and regions is required.

Take Home Messages

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the closure of medical school campuses and the shift of teaching/learning online.
  • Teaching/learning has shifted online and large group and small group sessions are being conducted using online platforms.
  • Virtual ward rounds, virtual surgical clinics, and online resources have been used for clinical teaching/learning.
  • Open book assessments, remote written exams with or without proctoring, online OSCEs, and structured online viva-voce are among the different methods used for assessment.
  • Student perception regarding these changes have been mixed. 

Notes On Contributors

Dr P Ravi Shankar MBBS, MD, FAIMER Fellow in Health Professions Education is a Faculty Member at the IMU Centre for Education, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Prof Ian G Wilson MBBS, FRACGP, MAssess & Eval, PhD, FAMEE is the Director of the IMU Centre for Education, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.




Abbasi, S., Ayoob, T., Malik, A. and Memon, S. I. (2020) ‘Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during Covid-19 at a private medical college’, Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36 (COVID19-S4), pp. 2–6.

Alrefaie, Z., Hassanien, M. and Al-Hayani, A. (2020) ‘Monitoring Online Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic; Suggested Online Learning Portfolio (COVID-19 OLP)’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–4.

Ashokka, B., Ong, S. Y., Tay, K. H., Loh, N. H. W., et al. (2020) ‘Coordinated responses of academic medical centres to pandemics: Sustaining medical education during COVID-19’, Medical Teacher. Taylor & Francis, 0(0), pp. 1–10.

Atreya, A. and Acharya, J. (2020) ‘Distant virtual medical education during COVID-19: Half a loaf of bread’, The Clinical Teacher, pp. 1–2.

Bianchi, S., Gatto, R. and Fabiani, L. (2020) ‘Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on medical education in Italy: Considerations and tips’, EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal, 15(24 Special Issue), pp. 100–101.

Boursicot, K., Kemp, S., Ong, T. H., Wijaya, L., et al. (2020) ‘Conducting a high-stakes OSCE in a COVID-19 environment’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–8.

Boyd, C. J., Inglesby, D. C., Corey, B., Greene, B. J., et al. (2020) 'Impact of COVID-19 on Away Rotations in Surgical Fields', The Journal of Surgical Research255, pp. 96–98. Advance online publication.

Cecilio-Fernandes, D., Parisi, M. C. R., Santos, T. M. and Sandars, J. (2020) ‘The COVID-19 pandemic and the challenge of using technology for medical education in low and middle income countries’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–7.

Chao, T. N., Frost, A. S., Brody, R. M., Byrnes, Y. M., et al. (2020) ‘ARTICLE IN PRESS Creation of an Interactive Virtual Surgical Rotation for Undergraduate Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic’, (215), pp. 1–4.

Chatterjee, S. (2020) ‘The COVID-19 Pandemic Through the Lens of a Medical Student in India’, International Journal of Medical Students, 8(1), pp. 82–83.

Choi, B., Jegatheeswaran, L., Minocha, A., Alhilani, M., et al. (2020) ‘The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on final year medical students in the United Kingdom: a national survey’, BMC Medical Education, 20(1), p. 206.

Compton, S., Sarraf‐Yazdi, S., Rustandy, F. and Kumar Radha Krishna, L. (2020) ‘Medical students’ preference for returning to the clinical setting during the COVID‐19 pandemic’, Medical Education, 10.1111/medu.14268.

COVID-19 map Johns Hopkins Corona Virus Resource Center. (2020) 'COVID-19 dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering' (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins.' (Accessed 15/07/2020).

Deng, A., Wang, J. J. and Tsui, B. C. H. (2020) 'Keeping trainees safe in a pandemic: the evolving role of medical simulation training', Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. pp. 1-2.

Ehrlich, H., McKenney, M. and Elkbuli, A. (2020) ‘We Asked the Experts: Virtual Learning in Surgical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic—Shaping the Future of Surgical Education and Training’, World Journal of Surgery. 44(7), pp. 2053–2055.

Fernandez-Altuna, M. de los A., Gutierrez Rayon, D., Ramirez Resendiz, M., Cruz Mendez, P., et al. (2020) ‘Experience of the biggest Med School in Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–12.

Fourtassi, M., Hjiej, G., Touissi, Y., Hajjioui, A., et al. (2020) ‘How has the COVID-19 pandemic improved evidence-based-medicine awareness among undergraduate medical students?’, Medical Education Online, 25(1), p. 1787123.

Franchi, T. (2020) ‘The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Current Anatomy Education and Future Careers: A Student’s Perspective’, Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(3), pp. 312–315.

Fuller, R., Joynes, V., Cooper, J., Boursicot, K., et al. (2020) ‘Could COVID-19 be our “There is no alternative” (TINA) opportunity to enhance assessment?’, Medical Teacher, pp. 1–6.

Gaudix, S. W., Winston, G. M., Chae, J.K., Haghdel, A., et al. (2020) 'Medical student concerns relating to neurosurgery education during COVID-19', World Neurosurgery, 139, pp. e836-e847.

Goh, P. S. and Sandars, J. (2020) ‘A vision of the use of technology in medical education after the COVID-19 pandemic’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–8.

Hall, S. and Border, S. (2020) 'Online Neuroanatomy Education and Its Role During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Lockdown.' World neurosurgery139, 628.

Hamad, S. M. S., Iqbal, S., Alothri, A. M., Alghamadi, M. A. A., et al. (2020) 'To teach is to learn twice” Added value of peer learning among medical students during COVID-19 Pandemic', MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1-7.

Hilburg, R., Patel, N., Ambruso, S., Biewald, M. A., et al. (2020) ‘Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning From A Distance’, Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Huddart, D., Hirniak, J., Sethi, R., Hayer, G., et al. (2020) ‘#Med StudentCovid – How social media is supporting students during COVID-19’, Medical Education, pp. 1–2.

Iwai, Y. and Lusk, P. (2020) ‘Transition to Virtual Reflection: Narrative Medicine during COVID-19’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–4.

Jeyakumar, Y., Sharma, D., Sirianni, G., Nyhof-Young, J., et al. (2020) ‘Limitations in virtual clinical skills education for medical students during COVID-19’, Canadian Medical Education Journal.

Kaur, N., Dwivedi, D., Arora, J. and Gandhi, A. (2020) ‘Study of the effectiveness of e-learning to conventional teaching in medical undergraduates amid COVID-19 pandemic’, National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 10(7), p. 1.

Lara, S., Foster, C. W., Hawks, M. and Montgomery, M. (2020) ‘Remote Assessment of Clinical Skills during COVID-19: A Virtual, High-Stakes, Summative Pediatric OSCE’, Academic Pediatrics, S1876-2859(20)30239-4. Advance online publication.

Leong, J. and Sarohia, G. S. (2020) ‘A New Reality: Experiences from Canadian Clerkship Medical Students during COVID-19’, International Journal of Medical Students, 8(1), pp. 68–69.

Longhurst, G. J., Stone, D. M., Dulohery, K., Scully, D., et al. (2020) ‘Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat (SWOT) Analysis of the Adaptations to Anatomical Education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic’, Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(3), pp. 301–311.

Mathieson, G., Sutthakorn, R. and Thomas, O. (2020) ‘Could the future of medical school examinations be open-book - a medical student’s perspective?’, Medical Education Online, 25(1), p. 1787308.

Nic, E. and Murphy, M. (no date) ‘Learning New Ways of Teaching and Assessment – The Impact of Covid-19 on Undergraduate Dermatology Education’, pp. 0–1.

Pattanshetti, V. M., and Pattanshetti, S. V. (2020) 'The Impact of COVID-19 on Medical Education in India', Journal of the Scientific Society, 47(1), pp.1-2.

Peloso, R. M., Ferruzzi, F., Mori, A. A., Camacho, D. P., et al. (2020) ‘Notes from the Field: Concerns of Health-Related Higher Education Students in Brazil Pertaining to Distance Learning During the Coronavirus Pandemic’, Evaluation & the Health Professions, p. 163278720939302.

Pennell, C. E., Chen, S. Q., Kluckow, H., Wisely, K. M., and Walker, B. L. D. (2020) 'Live streamed ward rounds – a tool for clinical teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic', The Medical Journal of Australia, Preprint, 25th May 2020, (Accessed 15/07/2020).

Ravi, K. S. (2020) ‘Dead Body Management in Times of Covid-19 and its Potential Impact on the Availability of Cadavers for Medical Education in India’, Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(3), pp. 316–317.

Reyna, J. (2020) ‘Twelve Tips for COVID-19 friendly learning design in medical education’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–16.

Roberts, V., Malone, K., Moore, P., Russell-Webster, T., et al. (2020) ‘Peer teaching medical students during a pandemic’, Medical Education Online, 25(1), pp. 4–6.

Roskvist, R., Eggleton, K. and Goodyear-Smith, F. (2020) ‘Provision of e-learning programmes to replace undergraduate medical students’ clinical general practice attachments during COVID-19 stand-down’, Education for Primary Care, 00(00), pp. 1–8.

Sabzwari, S. (2020) ‘Rethinking Assessment in Medical Education in the time of COVID-19’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–6.

Sam, A.H., Millar, K.R., and Lupton, M. G. F. (2020), 'Digital Clinical Placement for Medical Students in Response to COVID-19', Academic Medicine.

Samarasekera, D. D., Goh, D. L. M., Yeo, S. P., Ngiam, N. S. P., et al. (2020) ‘Response and Lessons Learnt Managing the COVID-19 Crisis by School of Medicine, National University of Singapore’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–12.

Sandars, J., Correia, R., Dankbaar, M., de Jong, P., et al. (2020) ‘Twelve tips for rapidly migrating to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–14.

Shehata, M. H., Abouzeid, E., Wasfy, N., Abdelaziz, A., et al. (2020) ‘Medical Education Adaptations Post COVID-19 - An Egyptian Reflection’, Preprints 2020060220.

Shehata, M. H., Kumar, A.P., Arekat, M. R., Atwa, H. et al., (2020) ‘Twelve tips to successfully conducting virtual clinical assessment using Zoom TM Lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic' Preprints, 2020060171,

Shih, K. C., Chan, J. C. H., Chen, J. Y. and Lai, J. S. M. (2020) ‘Ophthalmic clinical skills teaching in the time of COVID-19: A crisis and opportunity’, Medical Education, 54(7), pp. 663–664.

Tokuç, B. and Varol, G. (2020) ‘Medical education in Turkey in the time of covid-19’, Balkan Medical Journal, 37(4), pp. 180–181.

Veasuvalingam, B. and Goodson, M. L. (2020) ‘Falling back on technology mindfully during COVID-19 pandemic: NUMed campus experience’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–7.

Wadi, M., Abdalla, M. E., Khalafalla, H. and Taha, M. H. (2020) ‘The assessment clock: A model to prioritize the principles of the utility of assessment formula in emergency situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic’, MedEdPublish, 9(1), pp. 1–6.




There are no conflicts of interest.
This has been published under Creative Commons "CC BY-SA 4.0" (

Ethics Statement

This paper is a literature review.

External Funding

This article has not had any External Funding


Please Login or Register an Account before submitting a Review

Shazia Iqbal - (15/02/2021)
This is a very interesting and useful review as the authors have touched time need subject for review. This is a well written and structured approach to write this manuscript. The authors pointed out several important issues to sustain undergraduate medical student learning during the pandemic.
In the absence of patient contact, the significance of extending reality technology and Virtual simulation is a key point and medical educators must apply at medical schools. Although authors have highlighted the barriers (including the Issues of internet access, lack of electronic devices, absence of a quiet place to study or sit an exam without distractions), how to address these challenges would have to be elaborated especially in low resource countries.
Articles mention related to Open book exams, Online structured viva-voce and online OSCE for assessment of clinical skills ideas in various set up can help medical educators to apply at a medical institution. I would strongly recommend readers to follow the take-home message.
Sateesh Babu Arja - (12/02/2021) Panel Member Icon
I enjoyed reading this manuscript. It was very comprehensively written. The article is focused on comparing and contrasting the changes in medical education in teaching, bed-side teaching (clinical teaching), and assessments across the countries. This paper also highlighted the challenges while making those changes. The research methods are appropriate. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are adequate. The only suggestion is authors could have considered dividing the abstract into background, methods, results, and conclusion rather than without any subheadings.
John Sandars - (11/02/2021) Panel Member Icon
This review highlights the massive curriculum changes during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic but most importantly for me is that is also has a focus on the experiences of students. Like many reviews, it highlights more problems than potential solutions.

Although there is potential use in describing the changes it would have been useful to have had a greater focus on the perceptions of all stakeholders (policy makers, educators, students, patients) to the curriculum changes, including their recommendations for improving the experience. This information is essential for making future decisions about policy and practice so that teaching and learning can be optimised during these extraordinary times.