1. We need to build in opportunities for debrief and review
Previous in-person supervision allowed for organic discussions about logistics and scheduling. However, off-site clinical supervision risks missed connections and assumptions about how and when to touch base. Our reflections on the first few months of virtual supervision has taught us that we need protected time to review the logistics that we previously took for granted. We needed to ensure that there was a protected time period at the beginning of the clinic to promote the discussions of how cases will be reviewed, when they will be reviewed, and when they should be reviewed. Similarly, we need to build in the tools that we were all newly using to promote teaching: links to password protected videoconferencing tools were being included as staples in the EMR schedule.
2. Networking platforms/technologies need to be leveraged not just for patient care but for clinical teaching
While we grappled with how to use tools like Zoom, OTN, and phone conferencing for patient care, we realized that they had a separate identity in the world of Family Medicine resident teaching. We needed to reframe these tools as options to both review cases, as well as to be involved in indirect observation of patient encounters. Perhaps most important is the acceptance of these tools as the conduit to preceptor accessibility, promoting the teacher-resident relationship (Wearne et al., 2018).
For us, the early days of using these tools were clumsy. We realized that the logistics of these tools need support from those who understand them, leveraging these experts to create quick one-pager guidelines for clinical teachers who are less IT-adept. These observation tools will be especially important in the coming months as we welcome new Family Medicine residents into clinic and need to understand their level of competence with closer supervision. They will also be important tools in facilitating opportunities for residents to observe their preceptor’s approach to patient care as highlighted in the literature (Rietmeijer et al., 2018).
3. Traditional volumes of patients for Family Medicine residents in ambulatory clinics need to be adjusted
In our program, we have traditionally upheld clinical volumes as an important facet of training in order to breed diversity, breadth, and time management. However, changes from the pandemic began to limit encounters due to our protected debrief/review and the initial fumbling with tech use. It was also realized that Family Medicine residents are using their virtual assessment skills, without the necessary in-person experience that we as preceptors are relying on from (variable) years of practice. In our opinion, Family Medicine residents need more hands-on support to enhance their learning (and ensure appropriate patient care) with virtual encounters.
Whereas residents had previously gained competence from volumes of patient exposure, we now needed to look to more intensive preceptor support to cement their learning. This takes time and results in a need for a lighter schedule. As a result, our residents are actually working off their preceptor’s schedule to work more closely with a smaller volume of patients (currently 6 patients per half day).
In-person clinical appointment volumes for residents have also be changed in response to the added time for donning and doffing of PPE and the continuous the cleaning of patient rooms, the resident schedule became much more lightly booked.
4. Traditional volumes of patients for Family Medicine preceptors in ambulatory clinics need to be adjusted
While we were doing remote supervision in the early days of the pandemic with our own booked clinics, we likely weren’t doing it well. The numerous reasons for this are described in above points 1 – 3. Additionally, the balancing act of fielding calls from family medicine residents between our own virtual visits resulted in an intangible level of fragmentation of clinical care and teaching. As noted above, the nature of virtual visits likely requires the more intensive support of a preceptor to be effective in both teaching and clinical care. It became apparent to us that to teach virtually (and to do it well), we needed to scale back on patient visits during supervision days, reflective of the commitment we expect for our clinical teachers (Scheepers et al., 2015). As mentioned previously, our preceptors and residents are working together off of a single patient appointment schedule and volumes have been reduced.
5. Assessment in a family medicine postgraduate program needs to shift in response to virtual supervision
Family Medicine Resident supervisors in our program have traditionally used written field notes to document pearls of feedback based on competencies. Internal benchmarks (for field note frequency) have been suggested, but prior to the pandemic, field notes were written for residents on the minority of clinical encounters. Now, the reduced clinical volumes demand a shift in field note provision; written feedback (via fieldnotes) should be provided after the majority of patient encounters. This will allow supervisors to fine tune the teaching which is necessary when there are lower volumes. We will also need to give more feedback in response to other facets of virtual patient care (ex: residents emailing and using secure messaging with patients).