Research article
Open Access

Could Attendance at Medical School be improved? A Prospective Study of Medical Education at The University of Liverpool: Study of Attendance at a UK Medical School

Edward J. Nevins[1], Parisa L. Moori[2], Leanne Alexander[2], Bethany Richards[2], Victoria Bleasdale[2], Ajay K. Sharma[3]

Institution: 1. University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, 2. University of Liverpool, 3. Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool
Corresponding Author: Ms Parisa L. Moori ([email protected])
Categories: Education Management and Leadership, Medical Education (General), Students/Trainees
Published Date: 13/09/2016


Phenomenon: Attendance at UK medical school teaching sessions is on the decline. This research aimed to explore the reasons for this reduction.

Approach: Attendance was assessed, by way of head counts, at 3rd year students’ lectures, tutorials and problem based learning (PBL) sessions at the University of Liverpool. Reasons for absence were explored using a questionnaire sent via email to the year group.

Findings: Compulsory lectures attained greater attendance than non-compulsory lectures. Access to PowerPoint presentations prior to lectures correlated with a decline in attendance as did long timetable gaps. Lectures held on-campus were poorly attended compared to those held at hospital sites where students undertook clinical placements. Unsupervised PBL sessions, with sign in sheets, achieved excellent attendance however, turnout was poor when monitoring wasn’t present. Similar trends were observed for lecture attendance, indicating that students may be motivated to attend by fear of reprimand. 75 students responded to an online questionnaire exploring reasons for attendance and their responses largely agreed with our findings, however one discrepancy was highlighted. Students reported that access to lecture slides before teaching sessions would not affect attendance, although our evidence showed that when slides were available attendance declined.   

Insights: Attendance could be improved if teaching coincided with hospital placements. Sign-in sheets, fewer gaps between sessions and multiple lectures on one day would see a marked increase in attendees. In future, medical schools should consider these factors to enhance student motivation to attend teaching sessions. 

Keywords: Medical Education


Absenteeism in higher education establishments, including medical school, is becoming increasingly common both in the UK and worldwide.1–9 This is worrying due to the strong correlation between absenteeism and poor exam performance that has been demonstrated by a number of studies, across a variety of locations and subjects.5,7,8,10–28  

A lack of interest in subject matter, an un-favourable learning environment, excessive socialisation between students, perceived quality of teaching and ineffective lecture scheduling are cited as core reasons for absenteeism.29–33 Furthermore, improved access to online materials is an increasingly common reason for students’ non-attendance.1,6,29,34–40

It must be recognised that UK medical schools have large annual cohorts and it is therefore insurmountable to cater to individual learning style preferences within these sizeable groups. However, absenteeism amongst medical students is worrying for providers of medical education given their accountability for the overall professional performance of graduates and the increasing demands of financing such courses.41,42

Anecdotally, we have noted growing apathy amongst medical students towards attendance; with many placing little value on both clinical and classroom-based teaching sessions. The ability to learn effectively from books and online materials, coupled with poor quality teaching and exam pressures are cited by our fellow medical students as reasons for non-attendance. This study aims to evaluate attendance rates of 3rd year medical students at the University of Liverpool (UoL) and explore their reasons for lack of attendance, with a view to suggesting methods of improving attendance at UK medical schools.


Data collection

A prospective audit of attendance at 3rd year medical education sessions at UoL was carried out over a 4-month period in 2014, immediately preceding end of year summative examinations. All educational sessions throughout this time period were analysed during this time period. The 3rd year cohort were chosen as they rotate through specialty blocks that employ a variety of teaching methods such as lectures, small-group tutorials, and Problem Based Learning (PBL) sessions. Students in this year group were expected to attend lectures and tutorials held both at the University campus and at sites of clinical attachment (primary or secondary care), located varying distances from campus. UoL implements registers to monitor attendance at compulsory teaching sessions.  Uniquely, auditing this cohort enabled us to observe patterns of attendance according to session type, timing and location. UoL did not require formal ethical approval for this study.

Head counts were employed across 5 specialty rotations: pharmacology; paediatrics; neurology/neurosurgery and psychiatry; obstetrics and gynaecology; and community medicine/general practice. Attendance data from teaching sessions both on and off the University campus were included in the study. 


A survey was sent to the entire 3rd year student cohort in order to ascertain reasons for attendance or absenteeism. Survey responses were then compared to the audit data. The survey was open for 6 weeks in the period immediately following the attendance data collection. There was no incentive (financial or otherwise) for students to complete the survey.

Data Analysis

Data was compared from different educational sites and, where possible, at different time points across the study period to ascertain if any patterns of attendance could be observed. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare median attendance rates where appropriate using SPSS v.21.


Head count data was attained from 179 lectures, 54 PBL sessions and 44 tutorial sessions across the 5 speciality rotations (Table 1).  Small group tutorials exhibited the highest average attendance, 94.8% (range 44-100%, SD 12.7%, median 100%) of the three session types. Mean attendance at PBL sessions and lectures was 86.3% (range 0-100%, SD 24.5%, median 100%) and 83.8% (range 17-100%, SD 16.8%, median 88.9%) respectively. 

Lectures held off-campus at sites of clinical attachment were significantly better attended than those held on campus, 91.7% (range 52-100%, SD 11.1%, median 96.7%) v 73.1% (range 17-100%, SD 17.4%, median 74.6%) (p<0.01). When PowerPoint slides were available prior to the lecture (n=49), mean attendance was significantly reduced in comparison to sessions when the slides were not accessible beforehand (n=130), 69.2% (range 17-97%, SD 19.3%, median 69.2%) v 89.2% (range 52-100%, SD11.8%, median 93.3%) (p<0.01).   

Headcount data from the pharmacology rotation demonstrated that multiple, rather than single lectures, scheduled on the same day resulted in increased attendance rates (72.9% (n=40) vs 52.6% (n=9)) (p<0.01). Unfortunately a similar pattern could not be seen in other clinical rotations, though this is likely due to smaller sample sizes. Further data from this rotation showed that rates of attendance fell closer to the exam period (n= 18, 57.3% vs n = 31, 76.0%) (p<0.01).

Compulsory lectures with attendance monitoring resulted in higher levels of attendance than non compulsory lectures (n=130, 89.4% attendance vs n=49, 69.1%) (p<0.01). Furthermore, in supervised PBL sessions with sign in sheets, there was better attendance that student led sessions. (n = 48, 100% median attendance vs n = 6, 0% median attendance) (p<0.01).

Survey Results

A total of 75 students, accounting for 25.4% of the 3rd year medical student cohort, completed the optional survey. Survey responses were largely confirmatory of the conclusions drawn from head count data (Figure 1). The only exception to this was the availability of PowerPoint slides prior to lectures; mean attendance was reduced when slides were available prior to the session. However, survey data suggests that students are not less likely to attend these lectures. 


The UK is lacking evidence on university attendance due to very little research into the subject, with even less dedicated specifically to seminar sessions, despite this being a popular topic for researchers across the globe for over 20 years.5,6,26–28,43–45 Low levels of attendance have been reported repeatedly by these international studies however there remains a limited amount of literature focused on how to tackle this problem.46

Despite the authors’ judgments that attendance has declined, UoL’s medical school had a median attendance at lectures, tutorials and PBL sessions of over 88%. Questions are continually asked as to what influences students’ choices regarding attendance, and the general consensus indicates that they want to gain something from attending, rather than just avoiding disciplinary action. Responses to our survey indicate that students may not attend lectures if they do not perceive them to be beneficial. In addition to this, students expect good quality tutors who encourage interaction while teaching interesting and challenging topics.5,6,45,47

Students prefer smaller group sessions than lectures

Universities employ a variety of teaching styles and with large cohorts it is not possible to satisfy everybody’s specific needs. Historically, reports suggested that attendance is better at lectures compared to small group teaching.28,47 However, modern publications have suggested that students prefer self-study or smaller teaching sessions, and quote this as a reason for non-attendance at larger group sessions.48 In a recent publication, 70% of students preferred small group teaching to larger lectures but still recognised that lectures form a fundamental part of education. Remarkably, less than half of study participants thought attending lectures would improve exam scores.49 Moreover, it was recently suggested that there is a significant link between attending seminars and passing exams, however there is not the same correlation between lecture attendance and exam success.5

Our study data found that small group teaching sessions were better attended than lectures (94.8% vs 83.8%), which corroborates with the literature.48,49 This suggests that there has been a shift in the preference of modern day students, and that medical schools should tailor their delivery of the curriculum accordingly to incorporate more smaller group teaching sessions.

Students are more likely to attend if they have to travel larger distances

Remarkably, we have demonstrated that lecture attendance on campus was lower than lectures off campus, with a median of 74.6% and 96.7% respectively. We believe that students are more likely to attend lectures given as part of a structured clinical placement than travel to campus for sporadic teaching sessions, as has been demonstrated by the response to questions 3-5 in our survey.

The literature suggests that scheduling one lecture in a day has a negative effect on attendance and there is better attendance at lectures scheduled in the middle of the day when students are already likely to be on campus.39,50 Our study data has demonstrated that multiple lectures in one day result in better attendance (median 72.9% and 52.6% for both multiple and single lectures in one day respectively). In addition to this, students agreed via our survey that they were unlikely to attend a single scheduled lecture.

Various studies have found that timetabling factors are a recurring reason for non-attendance, whether this be due to clashes with other teaching sessions or simply due to the time of day they are scheduled.39,51 To tackle this problem university faculties should plan student-friendly timetables.52 For example, non-attendance was higher on Mondays and Fridays in studies of health science students, but also in the wider student body.30,31,50

Availability of lecture slides prior to lectures results in decreased attendance

Lectures have been shown to have a positive impact on learning53,54 and that students will attend lectures if they believe the content will provide additional information to what is already available.55 If students believe lectures are not a beneficial learning opportunity and that they can access online resources in their own time, then attendance will fall.56 Online resources have become readily available over the past decade.36,57–60 It is now common to find recordings of lectures or lecture slides online prior to teaching sessions. These twenty-first century advances create questions around the relevance of lectures delivered in the traditional manner.29,53,56,61

Our study data indicates that attendance is poor when lecture slides are available to students prior to lectures, compared to when unavailable (median 69.2% and 93.3% respectively, p<0.01). This suggests that students believe they can achieve the same level of knowledge from the resources provided regardless of attendance. This trend has been repeatedly found in the literature.6,33–36,49,60 However, a number of publications have suggested that attendance does not fall if resources are made available to students prior to lectures.58,62,63 This trend is reflected in the response to question 2 of our survey.

There are numerous positives to accessing online resources. Students often struggle to make organised, thorough lecture notes for revision. Having a template in the form of pre-released slides could potentially rectify this problem and improve revision techniques.26,58 Access to online material also gives students the option of distance learning. Studies have shown that students involved in distance learning do equally as well as students on site.37 It has also been reported that online resources can improve academic performance.64–66 However, a conflicting publication stated that digitally available lectures, as an alternative to students attending lectures, creates no difference in the knowledge students gain.67

There are also disadvantages of pre-releasing teaching materials. One is the loss of student-teacher interaction.51 Evidence suggests that poor attendance has significance with regards to professional development as well as academic performance. Absenteeism causes the student to waive their opportunity to develop relationships with their tutors who have a mentoring role and assist with their professional growth.21,22,49,68 This loss of professional socialisation is a worry amongst educators within the healthcare profession as interaction helps to identify role models.22,68,69 Hafeez et al stated that the role of the teacher in ensuring understanding and application of the content is still significant and thus encouraging lecture attendance is imperative.49

If students are unable to attend a lecture, online notes are an effective way of ensuring they can access any information they missed.58 However, there is a worry that this may increase temptation to ‘skip’ lectures and indeed, access to electronic resources means many medical students now choose not to attend teaching sessions, opting to carry out their own learning instead.39,40,51,70 Studies have shown that students who used notes provided by the lecturer had higher mean exams scores than those who didn’t.26,59 Harmon et al found that when students attend the lecture covering the topic in their exam, they are almost 20% more likely to answer correctly when compared to those students who solely study using the online material.51

Attendance monitoring improves attendance rates

There is debate as to whether the enforcement of compulsory attendance is a successful method to improve turnout. There is increasing evidence that attendance improves where such policies are employed,9,44 though this has not been unanimously reported.43 We have demonstrated that lecture attendance is better when the faculty records attendance, compared to no documentation of attendance (median = 89.4% and 69.1% respectively, p<0.01). We also have found the same pattern for PBL attendance (median = 100% and 0% respectively, p<0.01).

As aforementioned, a factor influencing attendance may be whether the student anticipates their absence will be noted. Declining numbers of students attending seminars as the year progresses may impel students not to attend, as they witness a lack of consequences for their peers’ who do not attend.5 This may also provide an explanation as to why attendance is better in small group sessions when compared to lectures, as absence is more likely to be detected where fewer people are expected at the session. However, this was not reflected in our survey where students stated that the use of sign in sheets encouraged their attendance.

Attendance is worse closer to the exam period

It has also been highlighted in the literature that attendance is particularly poor around exam periods when revision takes preference over lectures.1,71 This is echoed in our attendance data, and our survey where the majority of students (85%) stated that the impending exam period does affect their attendance at lectures. Likewise, a large proportion (57%) of students said they are less likely to attend lectures closer to exams, with 84% of students considering their own revision more useful. 

Furthermore, non-attendance at this time may be due to students having more confidence in themselves to learn outside of lectures or simply because they have low energy levels.39 Westrick et al demonstrated that 45% of students suggested a reason for absence to be tiredness from studying the night before.48

When we asked our student cohort if they attended lectures to gain insight into the topic or to learn, the majority (56%) stated it was to gain insight. Nearer to the exam period, it is likely that students already know what topics they should study, and therefore are less likely to attend. Due to this finding it may be worthwhile to structure the monitoring of attendance to coincide with the pattern of the academic year; with stringent monitoring at the beginning of the year to ensure students have a framework to base their learning around and then relax this closer to exams.39

Topic of teaching and the teacher influences attendance

The qualities of teachers, their practices and the relationship they have with their students appears to play a role in non-attendance to lectures.1,6,21,71 More specifically, disorganized lecturers who do not engage with students and are perceived as boring, will see lower numbers of attendance.33 In fact, poor lecture content is a frequently cited factor for non-attendance with one study reporting that 50% of their participants agreed with this concept.3,49 In addition, one study showed that 80% of medical students chose to attend specific lectures dependent on the lecture topic itself, while another found that 69% of students cite interest in the topic as a key reason for attendance48,55 Interestingly our survey results demonstrated that a vast majority (93%) of students consider the lecture topic or title to influence their decision to attend.

Therefore, it is imperative that tutors recognise their role in encouraging attendance and carefully consider the title given to lectures. Those who communicate well with students and provide well-organized lectures are far more likely to see larger numbers attending their sessions.6,49 It has been proven repeatedly that matching teaching methods with students learning styles will ensure they gain the maximum benefit from the teaching session.51


Limitations to the study include that participants were comprised of only one year group at a single UK medical school, limiting generalisability of the findings. Additionally, the student response rate to the online survey was relatively low (25.4%), and therefore, may not be representative of the year group.  The response rate might have been greater had the students been given an incentive to participate. Attendance monitoring was carried out was over 4 months; had this been extended to encompass the entire academic year this may have provided more robust evidence. Finally, we have not explored further reasons in this study for non-attendance as discussed in existing evidence, such as self-motivation,3,29,45,72 time management, events in student’s personal life50,72 and the social use of drugs and alcohol.3,16,72–74


We have demonstrated that small ward based learning opportunities are persistently well attended, even when approaching exam periods. Furthermore, our evidence shows that the use of sign-in sheets markedly improves attendance, and that student’s are more inclined to attend multiple teaching sessions with few gaps held on one day, as opposed to single lectures spread over a number of days. On occasions when lecture material was made available to students prior to the session, there was a distinct decrease in attendance. Although it was beyond the remits of our study to monitor attendance throughout the year, we discern from available literature that there may be benefit in increasing the number of lectures at the start of the academic year, allowing students more personal study time closer to exams. In future, medical schools should take these factors into consideration to enhance student motivation to attend these learning opportunities.

Take Home Messages

Notes On Contributors

Edward J. Nevins1

Parisa L. Moori2

Leanne Alexander2

Bethany Richards2

Victoria Bleasdale2

Ajay K. Sharma3,4,5


1 Foundation Doctor, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.

2 5th Year Medical Student, University of Liverpool Medical School, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.

3 Consultant Surgeon in Transplantation, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.

4 Director of Core Surgical Training, Merseyside, North West of England Deanery, United Kingdom.

5 Honorary Senior Lecturer and Associate Director of Post Graduate Courses in Transplantation, University of Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.


Special thanks should be given to Ruth Blessed who assisted in data collection.  This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.


1. Desalegn AA, Berhan A, Berhan Y. Absenteeism among medical and health science undergraduate students at Hawassa University, Ethiopia. BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14(1):81.   

2. Wadesango N, Machingambi S. Causes and Structural Effects of Student Absenteeism: A Case Study of Three South African Universities. J Soc Sci. 2011; 26:89.  

3. Kottasz R. Reasons for Student Non-Attendance at Lectures and Tutorials: an analysis. Investig Univ Teach Learn. 2005; 2(2):5-16.   

4. Gump SE. Guess who's (not) coming to class: student attitudes as indicators of attendance. Educ Stud. 2006; 32(1):39-46.   

5. Gbadamosi G. Should we bother improving students' attendance at seminars? Innov Educ Teach Int. 2013; 3297(April):1-11.   

6. Massingham P, Herrington T. Does Attendance Matter? An Examination of Student Attitudes, Participation, Performance and Attendance. J Univ Teach Learn Pract. 2006; 3(2):85.

7. Rodgers JR. A Panel-Data Study of the Effect of Student Attendance on University Performance. Aust J Educ. 2001; 45(3):284-295.   

8. Tsui-Fang Lin, Jennjou Chen, Lin T-F, Chen J. Cumulative class attendance and exam performance. Appl Econ Lett. 2006; 13(14):937.   

9. Marburger DR. Does Mandatory Attendance Improve Student Performance? J Econ Educ. 2006; 37(2):148.   

10. Credé M, Roch SG, Kieszczynka UM. Class Attendance in College A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship of Class Attendance With Grades and Student Characteristics. Rev Educ Res. 2010; 80(2):272-295.

11. Hidayat L, Vansal S, Kim E, Sullivan M, Salbu R. Pharmacy student absenteeism and academic performance. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012; 76(1).  

12. Gatherer D, Manning FCR. Correlation of examination performance with lecture attendance: A comparative study of first-year biological sciences undergraduates. Biochem Educ. 1998; 26(2):121-123.

13. Riggs JW, Blanco JD. Is there a relation between student lecture attendance and clinical science subject examination score? Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 84(2):311-313.   

14. Berenson SB, Carter G, Norwood K. The At-Risk Student in College Developmental Algebra. Sch Sci Math. 1992; 92(2):55-58.\n

15. Hammen CS, Kelland JL. Attendance and grades in a human physiology course. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267(6 Pt 3):S105-S108.   

16. Devadoss S, Foltz J. Evaluation of Factors Influencing Student Class Attendance and Performance. Am J Agric Econ. 1996; 78(3):499-507.  

17. Chan WP. Assessment of medical students' knowledge retention in a diagnostic radiology course: Lecture attendees versus absentees. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009; 38(3):237-239.   

18. Cortright RN, Lujan HL, Cox JH, DiCarlo SE. Does sex (female versus male) influence the impact of class attendance on examination performance? Adv Physiol Educ. 2011; 35(4):416-420.  

19. Horton DM, Wiederman SD, Saint D a. Assessment outcome is weakly correlated with lecture attendance: influence of learning style and use of alternative materials. AJP Adv Physiol Educ. 2012; 36:108-115.   

20. Millis RM, Dyson S, Cannon D. Association of classroom participation and examination performance in a first-year medical school course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009; 33(3):139-143.   

21. Friedman P, Rodriguez F, McComb J. Why Students Do and Do Not Attend Classes: Myths and Realities. Coll Teach. 2001; 49(4):124-133.   

22. Khan H, Khattak AM, Mahsud I, et al. Impact of class attendance upon examination results of students in basic medical sciences. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2003; 15(2):56-58.

23. Dhaliwal U. Absenteeism and under-achievement in final year medical students. Natl Med J India. 2003; 16(1):34-37.   

24. Cohn E, Johnson E. Class Attendance and Performance in Principles of Economics. Educ Econ. 2006; 14(2):211-233.   

25. McNulty JA, Hoyt A, Gruener G, et al. An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: associations with performance in the courses. BMC Med Educ. 2009; 9(1):6.  

26. Chen J, Lin T-F. Class Attendance and Exam Performance: A Randomized Experiment. J Econ Educ. 2008; 39(3):213-227.   

27. Newman‐Ford L, Fitzgibbon K, Lloyd S, Thomas S. A large‐scale investigation into the relationship between attendance and attainment: a study using an innovative, electronic attendance monitoring system. Stud High Educ. 2008; 33(6):699-717.   

28. Paisey C, Paisey NJ. Student attendance in an accounting module – reasons for non-attendance and the effect on academic performance at a Scottish University. Account Educ an Int J. 2004; 13(sup1):39-53.   

29. Dolnicar S. Should We Still Lecture or Just Post Examination Questions on the Web?: the nature of the shift towards pragmatism in undergraduate lecture attendance. Qual High Educ. 2005; 11(2):103-115.   

30. Marburger DR. Absenteeism and Undergraduate Exam Performance. J Econ Educ. 2001; 32(2):99-109.   

31. Timmins F, Kaliszer M. Absenteeism among nursing students - Fact or fiction? J Nurs Manag. 2002; 10(5):251-264.   

32. Dolnicar S, Kaiser S, Matus K, Vialle W. Can Australian Universities Take Measures to Increase the Lecture Attendance of Marketing Students? J Mark Educ. 2009; 31(3):203-211.   

33. Persky AM, Kirwin JL, Marasco CJ, May DB, Skomo ML, Kennedy KB. Classroom attendance: Factors and perceptions of students and faculty in US schools of pharmacy. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2014; 6(1):1-9.   

34. Cook D a. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med. 2005; 80(6):541-548.   

35. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education. Acad Med. 2006; 81(3):207-212.   

36. Fernandes L, Maley M, Cruickshank C. The impact of online lecture recordings on learning outcomes in pharmacology. J Int Assoc Med Sci Educ. 2008; 18(2):62-70.   

37. Eisen DB, Schupp CW, Isseroff RR, Ibrahimi OA, Ledo L, Armstrong AW. Does class attendance matter? Results from a second-year medical school dermatology cohort study. Int J Dermatol. 2015; 54(7):807-816.   

38. Zazulia AR, Goldhoff P. Faculty and medical student attitudes about preclinical classroom attendance. Teach Learn Med. 2014; 26(4):327-334.   

39. Mattick K, Crocker G, Bligh J. Medical student attendance at non-compulsory lectures. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2007; 12(2):201-210.   

40. Cardall S, Krupat E, Ulrich M. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med. 2008; 83(12):1174-1178.   

41. Schieffler D a, Azevedo BM, Culbertson R a, Kahn MJ. Financial implications of increasing medical school class size: does tuition cover cost? Perm J. 2012; 16(2):10-14.   

42. Richards A. Advancing the medical education mission: the bottom line. Acad Med. 2013; 88(4):434.   

43. St. Clair KL. A Case Against Compulsory Class Attendance Policies in Higher Education. Innov High Educ. 1999; 23(3):171-180.\n   

44. Launius MH. College student attendance attitudes and academic performance. Coll Stud J. 1997; 31:86-92.

45. Romer D. Do Students Go to Class? Should They? J Econ Perspect. 1993; 7(3):167-174.   

46. Wilder D, Flood W, Stromsnes W. The use of random extra credit quizzes to increase student attendance. J Instr Psychol. 2001; 28:117-120.   

47. Baderin M. Towards improving students' attendance and quality of undergraduate tutorials: A case study on law. Teach High Educ. 2005; 10:99-116.   

48. Westrick SC, Helms KL, McDonough SK, Breland ML. Factors influencing pharmacy students' attendance decisions in large lectures. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009; 73(5).   

49. Hafeez K, Khan M, Jawaid M, Haroon S. Low attendance in lectures at medical colleges of Karachi - a cross sectional survey. J Postgr Med Inst. 2014; 28(2):161-164.   

50. Kelly GE. Lecture attendance rates at university and related factors. J Furth High Educ. 2012; 36(1):17-40.   

51. Harmon O, Alpert W, A B, Lambrinos J. Class abscence, instructor lecture notes, intellectual styles and learning outcomes. Atl Ecom J. 2015; 43:349-361.   

52. Lipscomb M, Snelling PC. Student nurse absenteeism in higher education: An argument against enforced attendance. Nurse Educ Today. 2010; 30(6):573-578.   

53. Goffe WL, Sosin K. Teaching with Technology: May You Live in Interesting Times. J Econ Educ. 2005; 36(3):278-291.   

54. Sosin K, Lawson R, Hall J, Mateer GD. From Abba to Zeppelin, Led: Using Music to Teach Economics. J Econ Educ. 2008; 39(1):107-107.   

55. Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor KM. Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med. 2007; 82(10):S73-S76.   

56. Preston G, Phillips R, Gosper M, McNeill M, Woo K, Green D. Web-based lecture technologies: Highlighting the changing nature of teaching and learning. Australas J Educ Technol. 2010; 26(6):717-728. doi:10.14742/ajet.v26i6.1038.   

57. Elsasser G, Hoie E, Destache C, Monahan M. Availability of internet downloaded lecture audio files on class attendance and examination performance. Int J Instr Techn Dist Learn. 2009; 6(2):19-24.   

58. Grabe M, Christopherson K. Evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of providing lecture notes: The role of internet technology as a delivery system and research tool. Internet High Educ. 2005; 8(4 SPEC. ISS.): 291-298.   

59. Grabe M, Christopherson K. Optional student use of online lecture resources: Resource preferences, performance and lecture attendance: Original article. J Comput Assist Learn. 2008; 24(1):1-10.   

60. Davis EA, Hodgson Y, Macaulay JO. Engagement of students with lectures in biochemistry and pharmacology. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2012; 40(5):300-309.   

61. Gosper M, Mcneill M, Phillips R, Preston G. Web-based lecture technologies and learning and teaching: a study of change in four Australian universities. ALT-J. 2010; 18(3):251-263.   

62. Grabe M. Voluntary use of online lecture notes: Correlates of note use and note use as an alternative to class attendance. Comput Educ. 2005; 44(4):409-421.   

63. Vandehey MA, Marsh CM, Diekhoff GM. Providing Students With Instructors' Notes: Problems With Reading, Studying, and Attendance. Teach Psychol. 2005; 32(1):49-52.\[email protected]

64. Bollmeier SG, Wenger PJ, Forinash AB. Impact of online lecture-capture on student outcomes in a therapeutics course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010; 74(7):127.   

65. Kotey B, Anderson P. Performance of distance learning students in a small business management course. Educ + Train. 2006; 48(8/9):642-653.   

66. Hove MC, Corcoran KJ. If You Post It, Will They Come? Lecture Availability in Introductory Psychology. Teach Psychol. 2008; 35(2):91-95.   

67. Solomon DJ, Ferenchick GS, Laird-Fick HS, Kavanaugh K. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708. BMC Med Educ. 2004; 4:27.   

68. Hammer DP, Berger BA, Beardsley RS, Easton MR. Student professionalism. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003; 67(3).

69. Hughes S. Student attendance during college-based lectures: a pilot study. Nurs Stand. 2005; 19(47):41-49.  

70. Kamin C, Souza KH, Heestand D, Moses A, O'Sullivan P. Educational technology infrastructure and services in North American medical schools. Acad Med. 2006; 81(7):632-637.   

71. Bati AH, Mandiracioglu A, Orgun F, Govsa F. Why do students miss lectures? A study of lecture attendance amongst students of health science. Nurse Educ Today. 2013; 33(6):596-601.   

72. Moore S, Armstrong C, Pearson J. Lecture absenteeism among students in higher education: a valuable route to understanding student motivation. J High Educ Policy Manag. 2008; 30(1):15-24.   

73. Kearney CA. School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: A contemporary review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008; 28(3):451-471.   

74. Zimmerman MA, Schmeelk-cone KH. A Longitudinal Analysis of Adolescent Substance Use and School Motivation Among African American Youth. J Res Adolesc. 2003; 13(2):185-210.


Table 1. Number of sessions for which headcount data was obtained by clinical rotation

Figure 1 – Reasons for absenteeism survey responses from medical student participents


There are no conflicts of interest.
This has been published under Creative Commons "CC BY-SA 4.0" (


Please Login or Register an Account before submitting a Review

sathyanarayanan varadarajan - (01/10/2016) Panel Member Icon
This interesting original article deals with absenteeism amongst medical students which is worrying due to the strong correlation between absenteeism and poor exam performance that has been demonstrated by a number of studies. This is a must read for all medical education providers who’d like to explore the reasons for the decline in attendance and look for strategies to increase attendance in medical schools. This Prospective study aimed to evaluate attendance rates of 3rd year medical students at the University of Liverpool (UoL) and explore their reasons for lack of attendance. Some of the interesting findings of this study are : 1) Students prefer smaller group sessions than lectures 2) Students are more likely to attend if they have to travel larger distances 3) Availability of lecture slides prior to lectures results in decreased attendance 4) Attendance is poor when lecture slides are available to students prior to lectures, compared to when unavailable 5) Attendance monitoring improves attendance rates 6) Attendance is worse closer to the exam period 7) Topic of teaching and the teacher influences attendance. The authors strongly conclude that small ward based learning opportunities are persistently well attended, even when approaching exam periods. Limitations of the study are that participants were comprised of only one year group at a single UK medical school, shorter duration of the study and the student response rate to the online survey was relatively low.
Subha Ramani - (14/09/2016) Panel Member Icon
The authors have conducted an important study and used sound methodology to answer their study questions. Since the investment in medical training is sizable and schools are accountable to society, these answers are important to all countries with a similar education system. Moreover, if lowered attendance leads to lower pass rates, interventions are needed rather urgently. Using a variety of sessions and rotations for a head count and timing it prior to exams was a thoughtful approach. They have looked an impressive array of sessions- small and large group. It was very useful to distinguish between on and off site locations for the teaching sessions. I like the fact that the authors broke the discussion down by assumptions and provided evidence to prove or disprove them. They have also described the limitations well; this study raises additional questions for exploration.
For next steps, adding qualitative methodology and engaging students in conversations may be useful prior to designing interventions aimed at increasing attendance. What I did not see mentioned was the quality and / or variability of teacher skills, suggestions for increasing interactive learning even in large group settings and faculty development, these would be additional factors to evaluate. While I understand that many medical schools cannot shift entirely to small group sessions, designing interactive large group sessions, be it lectures or TBL type sessions would be beneficial. Sessions that add some pre- tests and in-class assignments and related to exams will also add value.
This article will be useful for medical school faculty leadership who develop curricula, monitor student performance on assessments and engage in staff development.